Skip to content
Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance

Our mission is to promote health for the benefit of the community by identifying and supporting healthcare innovation and collaboration to achieve improved quality, reduced costs, and improved patient experience.

$226k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$834kHuman Services$80kCrime & Legal$40kInternational$35kYouth Development$11k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $212,318, the rows itemized in this filing. The $225,718 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,400 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$36,104
Median grant
1
States reached
$411k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES$45,000
LITTLE HANDS THERAPY LLC$45,000
ENVISION EYECARE OF ALL$40,000
CENTRAL OREGON OTAGO PROGRAM INC$36,104
ADVANCED SPEECH AND LANGUAGE ERIN VANCE$24,400
THADD'S PLACE$11,245
DESTINATION REHAB$10,569
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $177k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THADD'S PLACE: $11k → 16%CENTRAL OREGON OTAGO PROGRAM INC: $36k → 10%DIVERSABILITY: $40k → 10%Treehouse Therapies Associates: $40k → 10%TREEHOUSE THERAPIES ASSOCIATES: $10k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON: $40k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in OR; by stated purpose, 76%.

Central Oregon Health Quality Alliancelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 7 repeat orgs$856k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
21

Total granted

$357k
$654k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

100%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES
    3× · 2020–2023 · $81k · revenue +71%
  • ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH
    2× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +113%
  • TP
    THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT
    2× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • DI
    Diversability Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -47%
  • NP
    NORTHWEST PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT M
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
2
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
3
Partners in Care

Partners in care is an integrated and comprehensive end of life services organization servicing the central oregon region with home health care; in-home hospice care; in-patient hospice care in partners in care hospice house; and…

Human Services
4
Community Health Partners

Promoting health for residents of Southwest Washington and Oregon.

Health
5
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—
6
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
7
Options for Southern Oregon

Programs for people of all ages who have mental health needs. Our holistic approach addresses housing, advocacy, community integration, crisis intervention, therapy, co-occuring issues, education, work & economic well-being

Health
8
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
9
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
10
Wallowa Valley Center for Wellness Inc

Strength in every struggle and hope in every heart.

Health
11
Mt Hood Hospice

It is the mission of Mt. Hood Hospice to provide an independent, community-based program of care for terminally ill patients and their loved ones that emphasizes dignity, comfort and choices for quality of life, regardless of the ability…

—
12
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bestcare Treatment Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thadds Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
11/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $80,000 · OtherONE COMMUNITY HEALTHLITTLE HANDS THERAPY LLC: $45,000 · OtherLITTLE HANDS THERAPY LLCENVISION EYECARE OF ALL: $40,000 · OtherENVISION EYECARE OF ALLNORTHWEST PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT M: $40,000 · OtherNORTHWEST PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MLIBERATION PATHWAYS: $40,000 · OtherLIBERATION PATHWAYSBEND ANESTHESIOLOGY GROUP PC: $40,000 · OtherBEND ANESTHESIOLOGY GROUP PCST CHARLES HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $40,000 · OtherST CHARLES HEALTH SYSTEMS INCIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAST CASCADES WOMENS GROUP: $31,000 · OtherEAST CASCADES WOMENS GROUPDESCHUTES COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES: $30,000 · OtherDESCHUTES COUNTY HEALTH SERVICESADVANCED SPEECH AND LANGUAGE ERIN VANCE: $24,400 · OtherHEARTHSIDE MEDICINE FAMILY CARE: $23,670 · OtherCENTRAL OREGON FOOT & ANKLE GROUP: $22,490 · OtherBEND MEMORIAL CLINIC PC DBA SUMMIT: $20,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES: $80,560 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF T…THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT: $65,139 · HealthTHE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECTHEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC: $45,000 · HealthHEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERV…LA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $44,300 · HealthLA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCENTRAL OREGON HEALTH COUNCIL: $37,500 · HealthCENTRAL OREGON HEALTH COUNCILOCHIN INC: $30,000 · HealthOCHIN INCDESTINATION REHAB: $20,469 · HealthDESTINATION REHABSt Charles Health System Inc: $19,200 · HealthThe Shield: $17,000 · HealthBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC: $15,000 · HealthTreehouse Therapies Associates: $50,000 · Human ServicesTreehouse Therap…Diversability Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesDiversability In…COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON: $40,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING…CENTRAL OREGON OTAGO PROGRAM INC: $36,104 · Human ServicesCENTRAL OREGON O…THADDS PLACE: $11,245 · Human ServicesTHADDS PLACEFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON: $29,182 · Youth DevelopmentCamp Fire Central Oregon: $11,275 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $40,000 · Crime & LegalMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $35,400 · International
Other$546,060Health$374,168Human Services$177,349Youth Development$40,457Crime & Legal$40,000International$35,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES: $80,560 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetONE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT: $65,139 over 2y, 11% of budgetTreehouse Therapies Associates: $50,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC: $45,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $44,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER: $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDiversability Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON: $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON HEALTH COUNCIL: $37,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON OTAGO PROGRAM INC: $36,104 over 1y, 59% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $35,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCHIN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON: $29,182 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDESTINATION REHAB: $20,469 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSt Charles Health System Inc: $19,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shield: $17,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Fire Central Oregon: $11,275 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHADDS PLACE: $11,245 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …St Charles Health Sys…United Way of Deschut…The Roundhouse Founda…Marie Lamfrom Charita…The Ford Family Found…First Interstate Banc…Central Oregon Health…Chambers Family Found…Braemar Charitable Tr…The Autzen FoundationM J Murdock Charitabl…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR27.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc · United Way of Deschutes County · The Roundhouse Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Central Oregon Health Council · Chambers Family Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Autzen Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Diversability Inc: 93% of income from government
  • Council On Aging of Central Oregon: 43% of income from government
  • Bestcare Treatment Services Inc: 27% of income from government
  • La Pine Community Health Center: 18% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children- Central Oregon: 16% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
  • One Community Health: 13% of income from government
  • Ochin Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades: 3% of income from government
  • St Charles Health System Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Peaceful Presence Project: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance?

Find your warmest path to Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home