Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance

Our mission is to promote health for the benefit of the community by identifying and supporting healthcare innovation and collaboration to achieve improved quality, reduced costs, and improved patient experience.

$194k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$834kHuman Services$80kCrime & Legal$40kInternational$35kYouth Development$11k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $184k
$39,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$403k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON$40,000
KIDS CENTER$40,000
THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT - V$39,800
MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL$35,400
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - CENTRAL OREGON$29,182
DESTINATION REHAB$9,900
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Treehouse Therapies Associates: $40k → 10%DIVERSABILITY: $40k → 10%TREEHOUSE THERAPIES ASSOCIATES: $10k → 10%COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON: $40k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 76% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Central Oregon Health Quality Alliancelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$337k · 6 repeat orgs$664k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$337k
$510k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+47%

Still filing today

100%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES
    3× · 2020–2023 · $81k · revenue +71%
  • ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH
    2× · 2021–2023 · $80k · revenue +113%
  • TP
    THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT
    2× · 2022–2024 · $65k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • DI
    Diversability Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -47%
  • NP
    NORTHWEST PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT M
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • BA
    BEND ANESTHESIOLOGY GROUP PC
    one grant, 2020 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
2
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
3
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

4
Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved

Health
5
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
6
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
7
Partners in Care

Partners in care is an integrated and comprehensive end of life services organization servicing the central oregon region with home health care; in-home hospice care; in-patient hospice care in partners in care hospice house; and…

Human Services
8
Oak Orchard Community Health Centerinc

To cultivate patient-centered health and wellness by providing engaged and innovative health care for our community.

Health
9
Partnership Health Center Inc

Partnership health center ensures that accessible, comprehensive primary healthcare is provided to the medically underserved population in our region, through a partnership of community resources.

10
Peninsula Community Health Services of Alaska

Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.

Health
11
Northeast Oregon Network

Northeast Oregon Network (the Organization) is a non-profit organization established to create a healthier Oregon by reducing barriers for both residents and regional systems that support their health. The Organization fulfills its mission…

Health
12
Challis Area Health Center Inc

We provide quality healthcare to our community.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Community Health and the most unlike its peers is The Peaceful Presence Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ONE COMMUNITY HEALTH — $80,000 · OtherONE COMMUNITY HEALTHNORTHWEST PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT M — $40,000 · OtherNORTHWEST PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MBEND ANESTHESIOLOGY GROUP PC — $40,000 · OtherBEND ANESTHESIOLOGY GROUP PCST CHARLES HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $40,000 · OtherST CHARLES HEALTH SYSTEMS INCLIBERATION PATHWAYS — $40,000 · OtherLIBERATION PATHWAYSIndividual grant recipient — $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAST CASCADES WOMENS GROUP — $31,000 · OtherEAST CASCADES WOMENS GROUPDESCHUTES COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES — $30,000 · OtherDESCHUTES COUNTY HEALTH SERVICESHEARTHSIDE MEDICINE FAMILY CARE — $23,670 · OtherHEARTHSIDE MEDICINE FAMILY CARECENTRAL OREGON FOOT & ANKLE GROUP — $22,490 · OtherBEND MEMORIAL CLINIC PC DBA SUMMIT — $20,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES — $80,560 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE…THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT — $65,139 · HealthTHE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECTLA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $44,300 · HealthLA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERCENTRAL OREGON HEALTH COUNCIL — $37,500 · HealthCENTRAL OREGON HEALTH COUNCILOCHIN INC — $30,000 · HealthOCHIN INCSt Charles Health System Inc — $19,200 · HealthSt Charles Health System IncThe Shield — $17,000 · HealthThe ShieldBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC — $15,000 · Health+1 more — $9,900 · HealthTreehouse Therapies Associates — $50,000 · Human ServicesTreehouse Ther…COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON — $40,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGI…Diversability Inc — $40,000 · Human ServicesDiversability …FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON — $29,182 · Youth DevelopmentCamp Fire Central Oregon — $11,275 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $40,000 · Crime & LegalMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $35,400 · International
Other$436,660Health$318,599Human Services$130,000Youth Development$40,457Crime & Legal$40,000International$35,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES — $80,560 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetONE COMMUNITY HEALTH — $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT — $65,139 over 2y, 11% of budgetTreehouse Therapies Associates — $50,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetLA PINE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $44,300 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON — $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDiversability Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $40,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON HEALTH COUNCIL — $37,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL — $35,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCHIN INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON — $29,182 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSt Charles Health System Inc — $19,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shield — $17,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Fire Central Oregon — $11,275 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDESTINATION REHAB — $9,900 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR27.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc · United Way of Deschutes County · The Roundhouse Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Central Oregon Health Council · Chambers Family Foundation · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Autzen Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 14%
  • Diversability Inc93% of income from government
  • Council On Aging of Central Oregon43% of income from government
  • Bestcare Treatment Services Inc27% of income from government
  • La Pine Community Health Center18% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children- Central Oregon16% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International14% of income from government
  • One Community Health13% of income from government
  • Ochin Inc4% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades3% of income from government
  • St Charles Health System Inc0% of income from government
  • The Peaceful Presence Project0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance?

Find your warmest path to Central Oregon Health Quality Alliance through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph