· Public charity
Center for the Study of Social Policy
The CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF SOCIAL POLICY, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEGAL AID SOCEITY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC | $60,000 |
| KENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC | $60,000 |
| NORTHWESTERN COUNSELING & SUPPORT SERVICES INC | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $378k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $120k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCHOC FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $315k · revenue +103%
- LFLAMOILLE FAMILY CENTER INC4× · 2017–2021 · $272k · revenue +42%
- KYKENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC3× · 2020–2022 · $111k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- ACALLEGHENY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICESone grant, 2017 · $50k
- VNVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL JERSEYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +68%
- YPYOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF IOWAone grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -54%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of children's friend and service (the organization) is to be the innovative leader in improving the well-being and healthy development of rhode island's most vulnerable young children. they accomplish this by providing flexible…
All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Start early advances quality early learning for families with children, before birth through their earliest years, to help close the opportunity gap.
To partner with organizations and communities to drive systemic change that impacts the root causes of child abuse and neglect.
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
To strengthen the well-being and development of families and individuals through professional human services programs, including therapy, counseling, education, special assistance, and advocacy.
The north carolina partnership for children (ncpc) is the lead organization and backbone of the smart start network, setting statewide vision, policy, and funding priorities. while local partnerships translate the statewide vision into…
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
Aimhitn supports professionals through training, resources, and community involvement to foster the early relational health of infants, young children, and families.
To build and strengthen families and their children, instilling hope for the future and a better quality of life.
Children's home society of florida mission statement:building bridges to success for children
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern Counseling & Support Services and the most unlike its peers is Youth Policy Institute of Iowa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAMOILLE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY YOUTH ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHWESTERN COUNSELING & SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Columbia-Willamette ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL JERSEY ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH POLICY INSTITUTE OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds EFFECTIVE PLANNING & INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION INC ↗
- Who funds MULTI-AGENCY ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST STEPS KENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for the Study of Social Policy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lamoille Family Center Inc — 36% of income from government
- United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County Inc — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.