Skip to content

· Public charity

Center For the Advancement of Science In Space Inc

Established through congressional authority and supported by NASA via cooperative agreement #80JSC018M005, the CASIS mission is to foster scientific discovery and technological innovation in space, expand U.S.

$5.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
49
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$432k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$26MHealth$6.5MEducation$5.9MCommunity Improvement$2.3MEnvironment$1.3MArts & Culture$118kFood & Nutrition$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $474k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+7 grants · $2.2M
$52,520
Median grant
20
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Eascra Biotech$432,300
Nanoracks LLC$365,828
Space Tango Inc$365,240
TransAstra Corporation$290,625
Redwire Space Technologies Inc$280,387
Leocloud Inc$255,060
Regents of the University of Colorado$254,779
Axiom Space$248,596
Alpha Space Test and Research Alliance LLC$246,743
Regents of the University of Colorado$201,488
Xheme Inc$199,137
Tec-Masters Inc$154,155
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center$150,000
Redpoint Oncology Inc$137,860
Wake Forest University Health Sciences$131,237
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NCESSETIDES CENTER: $100k → 10%NATIONAL CENTER FOR EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE EDUCATION: $70k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Center For the Advancement of Science In Space Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Center For the Advancement of Science In Space Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36M · 85 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

85 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 54 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

85
33

Total granted

$36M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+44%

Still filing today

22%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthScience & TechCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    4× · 2017–2023 · $881k · revenue +67%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $653k · revenue +44%
  • EU
    Emory University
    7× · 2018–2025 · $590k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • MC
    MAYO CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • FI
    FOMS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $140k
  • RM
    RADIATION MONITORING DEVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $120k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
10
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Institute of Technology Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Jewish Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
26/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $4,396,719 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOSPACE TANGO INC: $3,656,414 · OtherSPACE TANGO INCTECHSHOT INC: $3,093,121 · OtherTECHSHOT INCZIN TECHNOLOGIES INC: $1,957,576 · OtherZIN TECHNOLOGIES INCREDWIRE SPACE TECHNOLOGIES INC: $1,482,271 · Other+106 more: $20,034,558 · Other+106 moreBaylor College of Medicine: $881,350 · EducationBaylor Colleg…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $652,668 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $632,926 · EducationTHE BOARD OF …Emory University: $589,606 · EducationEmory Univers…University of Notre Dame du Lac: $480,621 · EducationUniversity of…Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $301,473 · EducationMassachusetts…Illinois Institute of Technology: $277,162 · EducationIllinois Inst…CARTHAGE COLLEGE: $181,767 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $180,000 · Education+7 more: $622,261 · Education+7 moreMASSCHALLENGE INC: $805,000 · Community ImprovementCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $375,000 · HealthGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $110,699 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $23,411 · HealthRADIO AMATEUR SATELLITE CORP: $230,634 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $162,000 · Arts & CultureThe Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc: $55,325 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $8,000 · Arts & CultureORION'S QUEST: $268,290 · Science & TechSCIENCE FRIDAY INITIATIVE INC: $58,880 · Science & TechTIDES CENTER: $169,800 · Human Services
Other$34,620,659Education$4,799,834Community Improvement$805,000Health$549,110Arts & Culture$455,959Science & Tech$327,170Human Services$169,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $881,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMASSCHALLENGE INC: $805,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $652,668 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $632,926 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $589,606 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $480,621 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $376,645 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $375,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $301,473 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Institute of Technology: $277,162 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORION'S QUEST: $268,290 over 5y, 48% of budgetRADIO AMATEUR SATELLITE CORP: $230,634 over 4y, 14% of budgetCARTHAGE COLLEGE: $181,767 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $180,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $169,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $162,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE QUEST INSTITUTE FOR QUALITY EDUC: $149,955 over 3y, 15% of budgetFLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $123,210 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $110,699 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $81,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $64,659 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCREATORSPACE: $60,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetSCIENCE FRIDAY INITIATIVE INC: $58,880 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetThe Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc: $55,325 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $23,411 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMuseum of Aviation at Robins AFB Georgia Foundation Inc: $11,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASTRONAUTS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMichigan Crossroads Council Inc Boy Scouts of America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MONMOUTH COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds MASSCHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins UniversityMD20.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc · Trustees of Boston University · President and Fellows of Harvard College · University of Pittsburgh · American Heart Association Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Center For the Advancement of Science In Space Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Center For the Advancement of Science In Space Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Florida Institute of Technology Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Masschallenge Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Center For the Advancement of Science In Space’s filings →

More from the funding graph