· Public charity
Center for Health and Learning Ltd
Building a foundation for healthy communities through educational resources, leadership training, policy developments and technical assistance.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $42,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $62,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University of Vermont Medical | $15,000 |
| Howard Center | $12,500 |
| Richmond Family Medicine | $7,500 |
| Notheastern Vermont Regional | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCHAMPLAIN COLLEGE INCORPORATED2× · 2021–2022 · $57k · revenue +3%
- LCLANDMARK COLLEGE INC2× · 2021–2022 · $35k · revenue +19%
- HCHOWARD CENTER INC2× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue -2%
Funded once
- CCCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF VERMONT - MONTPELIERone grant, 2022 · $27k
- NCNorthern Counties Health Care Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +27%
- LFLAMOILLE FAMILY CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +43%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
Provide psychology & counseling to members of society who display behavior & psychological problems.
Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.
Centering on a concept and continuum of care that embraces the health, well-being and dignity of each patient, regardless of their ability to pay, northeast hospital corporation (nhc) has four facilities, beverly hospital, addison gilbert…
To promote, preserve and restore the health of persons residing in northwestern vermont.
Cvmc works collaboratively to meet the needs and improve the health of the residents of central vermont.
MaineHealth is a voluntary, not-for-profit community and referral system of hospitals, dedicated to providing high quality health care services to all persons who seek care regardless of their sex, race, religion, age, color, sexual…
To improve the health of the rutland region & surrounding communities by providing appropriate, superior, integrated, preventative, diagnostic & therapeutic health services in a caring environment through the strength of our people,…
The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…
Howard Center, Inc. helps people and communities thrive by providing supports and services to address mental health, substance use and developmental needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwestern Counseling & Support Services and the most unlike its peers is Landmark College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHAMPLAIN COLLEGE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds LANDMARK COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds HOWARD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Northern Counties Health Care Inc ↗
- Who funds LAMOILLE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc ↗
- Who funds Lamoille Health Partners Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST KINGDOM HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds RUTLAND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LAMOILLE COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds HEALTH CARE & REHABILITATION SERVICES OF SOUTHEASTERN VT INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWESTERN COUNSELING & SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Vermont Council of Developmental and Mental Health Services Inc · Lamoille Family Center Inc · American Academy of Pediatrics-Vt Chapter · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Health and Learning Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lamoille Family Center Inc — 36% of income from government
- Lamoille Health Partners Inc — 19% of income from government
- Springfield Medical Care Systems Inc — 16% of income from government
- Northern Counties Health Care Inc — 14% of income from government
- Northeast Kingdom Human Services Inc — 8% of income from government
- Rutland Mental Health Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc — 2% of income from government
- Northeastern Vermont Regional Hosp Inc — 1% of income from government
- Landmark College Inc — 1% of income from government
- The University of Vermont Medical Center — 1% of income from government
- Lamoille County Mental Health — 0% of income from government
- Champlain College Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.