· Public charity
Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc
To improve the health and well-being of the sacramento community and to ensure that its families and children have the best environment in which to grow and thrive.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $211k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EARTH MAMA HEALING INC | $45,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN LIBERATION NETWORK | $45,000 |
| THE RACE AND GENDER EQUITY PROJECT | $45,000 |
| SOL COLLECTIVE | $35,000 |
| NATIVE SISTERS CIRCLE | $30,000 |
| UNITED AND GUIDED | $11,000 |
| HOOKED ON FISHING NOT ON VIOLENCE FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| OUTSIDE THE WALLS INC | $6,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4290% since the first grant, against +101% for those funded once.
3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- EMEARTH MAMA HEALING INC2× · 2022–2023 · $95k
- UAUNITED AND GUIDED2× · 2022–2023 · $17k · revenue ×44 · 38% of their budget
- HOHOOKED ON FISHING NOT ON VIOLENCE FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $16k · revenue +194%
Funded once
- NDNATIVE DADS NETWORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +101%
- RIRAGE INCone grant, 2022 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $45k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance and protect the Black community in the areas of Health, Health Equity, Mental Health, Social Justice, and Substance Abuse.
Youth Outreach
United Women of the Horn (UWH) exists to advance the leadership, safety, and civic participation of Black immigrant women, with a focus on East African communities. The organization delivers trauma-informed, culturally grounded programs…
The Radical ALLI Center provides free training opportunities for Black youth.
To provide culturally grounded substance use recovery support, case management, and community economic empowerment to Black and underserved communities in Northern California.
To promote healing, positive cultural identity, holistic wellness and connection among intergenerational indigenous women and our families by sharing our collective wisdom, traditions, wellness practices and stories. we focus on healing by…
A youth organization that facilitates transformative MENTORING, EDUCATION, and WELLNESS opportunities for young people.
Youth
Disrupting intergenerational trauma and poverty in Del Paso Heights and surrounging areas.
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIVE DADS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds The Race and Gender Equity Project ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN LIBERATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE SISTERS CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds ALWAYS KNOCKING INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED AND GUIDED ↗
- Who funds HOOKED ON FISHING NOT ON VIOLENCE FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Sierra Health Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc?
Find your warmest path to Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Center for Community Health and Well-Being’s filings →