· Public charity
Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc
To improve the health and well-being of the sacramento community and to ensure that its families and children have the best environment in which to grow and thrive.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $226,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $254,631 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $28,631 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $211k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE RACE AND GENDER EQUITY PROJECT | $45,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN LIBERATION NETWORK | $45,000 |
| EARTH MAMA HEALING INC | $45,000 |
| SOL COLLECTIVE | $35,000 |
| NATIVE SISTERS CIRCLE | $30,000 |
| UNITED AND GUIDED | $11,000 |
| HOOKED ON FISHING NOT ON VIOLENCE FOUNDATION | $9,000 |
| OUTSIDE THE WALLS INC | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4290% since the first grant, against +101% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMEARTH MAMA HEALING INC2× · 2022–2023 · $95k
- UAUNITED AND GUIDED2× · 2022–2023 · $17k · revenue ×44 · 38% of their budget
- HOHOOKED ON FISHING NOT ON VIOLENCE FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $16k · revenue +194%
Funded once
- NDNATIVE DADS NETWORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +101%
- RIRAGE INCone grant, 2022 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $45k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To advance and protect the Black community in the areas of Health, Health Equity, Mental Health, Social Justice, and Substance Abuse.
Youth Outreach
United Women of the Horn (UWH) exists to advance the leadership, safety, and civic participation of Black immigrant women, with a focus on East African communities. The organization delivers trauma-informed, culturally grounded programs…
The Radical ALLI Center provides free training opportunities for Black youth.
To provide culturally grounded substance use recovery support, case management, and community economic empowerment to Black and underserved communities in Northern California.
To promote healing, positive cultural identity, holistic wellness and connection among intergenerational indigenous women and our families by sharing our collective wisdom, traditions, wellness practices and stories. we focus on healing by…
A youth organization that facilitates transformative MENTORING, EDUCATION, and WELLNESS opportunities for young people.
Youth
Disrupting intergenerational trauma and poverty in Del Paso Heights and surrounging areas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hooked On Fishing Not On Violence Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Asian American Liberation Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIVE DADS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN LIBERATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds The Race and Gender Equity Project ↗
- Who funds THE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE SISTERS CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds ALWAYS KNOCKING INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED AND GUIDED ↗
- Who funds HOOKED ON FISHING NOT ON VIOLENCE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Sierra Health Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc?
Find your warmest path to Center for Community Health and Well-Being Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.