Skip to content

· Public charity

Center for Asian American Media

To present stories that convey the richness and diversity of asian american experiences to the broadest audience possible.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.5MHealth$120kPhilanthropy$110kCivil Rights$75kCommunity Improvement$50kReligion$22kHuman Services$20kCrime & Legal$20k
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 30 grants below total $1,482,238, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,816,738 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $334,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k16 grants · $357k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
$40,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Thank You for Thinking of Me$100,000
African Cowboy DBA Dream Seek$100,000
Cloud Machine LLC$100,000
Sublime Madness$100,000
Capital K Pictures$100,000
USMP LLC$100,000
Flash Cuts$75,000
WNET Educational Broadcasting$75,000
Third Cousin Pictures Inc$75,000
Yoube Productions LLC$75,000
From Kudzu Collective LLC$75,000
Center for Independent Doc$50,000
International Documentary Ass$50,000
Bayani Workshop$50,000
Japanese American National$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Mekong Inc: $20k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NE
VA
MD
AR
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

23%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$997k · 11 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
65

Total granted

$997k
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+22%

Still filing today

45%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    AXS Lab Inc
    3× · 2017–2021 · $120k · revenue +62%
  • THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $58k · revenue +106%
  • DP
    DETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA
    2× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • RP
    ROSE PAK COMMUNITY FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +81%
  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +56%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
WorkingFilms Inc

Recognizing the power of film to inspire, Working Films positions documentaries to increase civic engagement and shift culture at the local, state, and national level.

Arts & Culture
2
Dc Dox

Dc dox is a major international film festival in the nation's capital dedicated to promoting documentary film as a leading art form, championing new voices and innovations in non-fiction storytelling, and using film as a catalyst to engage…

—
3
Center for Asian American Media

To present stories that convey the richness and diversity of asian american experiences to the broadest audience possible. the center does this by funding, producing, distributing, and exhibiting films, television, live performances and…

Arts & Culture
4
Fund for Innovative Tv

The fund for innovative tv has been producing challenging documentary video and television since 1990. it currrently operates the media burn archive, whose mission is to use archival media to deepen context and encourage critical thought…

Arts & Culture
5
Center for Emerging Media Inc
Arts & Culture
6
Doc Society Inc

We bring people together to unleash the transformational power of independent documentary film. we serve individual filmmakers and the growing network of partners who support them globally. we help build new models, aiming to innovate,…

Philanthropy
7
Double Portion Media

Double portion media is a non-profit organization devoted to mass media to create, produce and distribute various types of programs, including talk show, drama and general entertainment. these programs will reflect the multiculturalism of…

Arts & Culture
8
Docs in Progress Inc

Docs in progress is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization which gives individuals the tools to tell stories through documentary film to educate, inspire, and transform the way people view their world.

Arts & Culture
9
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

—
10
Cinespeak
Arts & Culture
11
Prx Inc

To lead changes that expand public media as a trusted source of knowledge, information, and inspiration for all.

Arts & Culture
12
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vision Maker Media; the most unlike its peers is Rose Pak Community Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
13/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHOL SOO LEE DOCUMENTARY LLC: $133,376 · OtherThank You for Thinking of Me: $100,000 · OtherUSMP LLC: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherCLOUD MACHINE LLC: $100,000 · OtherSublime Madness: $100,000 · OtherAFRICAN COWBOY LLC: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherCapital K Pictures: $100,000 · Other+65 more: $1,923,000 · Other+65 moreWGBH Educational Foundation: $247,000 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educational FoundationAMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INC: $170,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INCAXS Lab Inc: $120,000 · Arts & CultureAXS Lab IncGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL …WNET: $75,000 · Arts & CultureWNETTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $57,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 · Arts & CultureLATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more: $237,000 · Arts & Culture+10 moreAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote: $75,000 · Civil RightsFIRELIGHT MEDIA INC: $52,000 · Civil RightsSikh American Legal Defense & Education: $20,000 · Civil RightsNORTH DAKOTA NATIVE VOTE: $16,238 · Civil RightsROSE PAK COMMUNITY FUND: $100,000 · PhilanthropyWestern Native Voice Inc: $11,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementMekong Inc: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$2,856,376Arts & Culture$1,206,500Civil Rights$163,238Philanthropy$100,000Community Improvement$21,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $247,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INC: $170,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetAXS Lab Inc: $120,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetROSE PAK COMMUNITY FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWNET: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAsian & Pacific Islander American Vote: $75,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $57,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFIRELIGHT MEDIA INC: $52,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBLACK PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetJAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC MEDIA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDiaspora Arts Connection Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetUNIONDOCS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSikh American Legal Defense & Education: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetMu Films: $20,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetThe Bay Area Video Coalition Incorporated: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFARALLON DOCUMENTARY FILMS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetWALKING IRIS MEDIA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISION MAKER MEDIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds AXS Lab Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROSE PAK COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds Asian & Pacific Islander American Vote ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds LATINO PUBLIC BROADCASTING ↗
  • Who funds BLACK PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN NATIONAL MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNY26.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Sundance Institute · The San Francisco Foundation · Chicken & Egg Films Inc · Perspective Media Initiatives Inc · Pacific Islanders in Communications · Jerome Foundation Inc · Wyncote Foundation · International Documentary Foundation Inc · Gofundmeorg

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Center for Asian American Media funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Center for Asian American Media. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Center for Asian American Media’s filings →

More from the funding graph