Skip to content
Celado-Stenger Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Celado-Stenger Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$11kCommunity Improvement$4kEmployment$4kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$2kRecreation & Sports$2kHealth$1kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$600
Median grant
4
States reached
$527k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Kiera Grace Foundation$3,135
Mi Casa Resource Center$3,000
Athletics Beyond$1,500
HOYA Foundation$1,500
Boys Girls Club$1,140
Individual grant recipient$900
Individual grant recipient$600
Fundacion Viva de Colores Inc$512
National MS Society$500
Colorado Gives Foundation$260
Mountain Vista High School$210
Pelotonia Cancer Foundation$104
Colorado Childrens Campaign$100
Colorado Pug Rescue$10
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Mi Casa Resource Center: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17k · 5 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$17k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+8%

Still filing today

60%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalEmploymentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue -15%
  • HF
    HOYA Foundation
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2024 · $1k

Funded once

  • FV
    Foundacion Viva de Colores Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • HC
    Hispanic Contractors of Colorado
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Careerwise Colorado

Careerwise's mission is to forge pathways to meaningful careers through bold advocacy, innovative apprenticeships, and industry led partnerships, creating a dynamic talent ecosystem that connects ambition to opportunity for empowered young…

Education
2
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—
3
Medtech Innovator

Medtech innovator organizes and runs a global competition and virtual accelerator for medical device, digital health, and diagnostic startup companies.

Education
4
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
5
Rocky Mountain Institute

Transform the global energy system to secure a clean, prosperous, zero-carbon future for all.

—
6
Public Education & Business Coalition

Every child deserves a great educator. pebc works across the nation to prepare outstanding new teachers, help practicing teachers and leaders become exceptional, and shape systems and policies in order to foster vibrant growth and lasting…

Education
7
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Endeavor Global Inc (F/K/a the Endeavor Initiative Inc)

Endeavor is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement around the world.

International
10
American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine

Aacom leads and advocates for the osteopathic medical education community to improve the health of the public. aacom represents and advances the continuum of medical education by: supporting our member institutions as they educate the…

Education
11
Colorado Business Committee for the Arts

Colorado business committee for the arts (cbca)s mission is to advance colorados creative economy by connecting business and arts. we accomplish this mission through statewide advocacy, research, training, volunteerism and arts engagement…

Arts & Culture
12
National Association of Charter School Authorizers

To promote the establishment and operation of quality charter schools through responsible oversight in the public interest. nacsa serves the education and resource needs of the full range of chartering authorities across the country, whose…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Colorado Pug Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Kiera Grace Foundation: $3,135 · OtherKiera Grace FoundationFoundacion Viva de Colores Inc: $1,630 · OtherFoundacion Viva de Colores IncAthletics Beyond: $1,500 · OtherAthletics BeyondHispanic Contractors of Colorado: $1,425 · OtherHispanic Contractors of ColoradoBoys Girls Club: $1,140 · OtherBoys Girls ClubIndividual grant recipient: $1,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFundacion Viva de Colores Inc: $512 · OtherNational MS Society: $500 · Other+4 more: $840 · Other+4 moreCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $11,000 · InternationalCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INCHOYA Foundation: $4,000 · EmploymentHOYA Foundatio…MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesMI CASA RE…NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 · HealthCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $572 · PhilanthropyContractor Academy: $235 · EducationPELOTONIA: $104 · EducationCOLORADO PUG RESCUE: $10 · Animals
Other$12,682International$11,000Employment$4,000Human Services$3,000Health$750Philanthropy$572Education$339Animals$10

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOYA Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $572 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetContractor Academy: $235 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO PUG RESCUE: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Celado-Stenger Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Celado-Stenger Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Celado-Stenger Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home