Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cecil and Virgie Burton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$229kArts & Culture$183kReligion$88kEnvironment$76kHealth$45kPhilanthropy$10kCommunity Improvement$5kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $103k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
All Souls Unitarian Church$25,000
Pathways Adult Learning Center$22,000
Holland Hall$17,500
Tulsa Botanic Garden$16,000
The University of Tulsa$12,000
Tulsa Community Foundation$10,000
Tulsa Girls Art School$7,500
St Patrick's Episcopal Church$6,000
108 Contemporary$6,000
Riverfield Country Day School$6,000
Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma$5,000
Tulsa Day Center$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma: $1k → 15%Pathways Adult Learning Center: $2k → 15%Pathways Adult Learning Center: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 14 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$609k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+7%

Still filing today

43%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    8× · 2017–2025 · $64k · revenue +8%
  • PA
    Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc
    4× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue ×12
  • CP
    CHOREGUS PRODUCTIONS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • R6
    ROUTE 66 ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • ARTS ALLIANCE TULSA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -5%
  • OV
    Oklahoma Visual Arts Coalition
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Performing Arts Center Trust

Tulsa performing arts center trust provides opportunities to experience diversity through the arts.

—
2
Theatre Tulsa Inc

Theatre tulsa provided theatre education programming throughout the fiscal year serving 125 students. the education program included 3 staged youth shows.

Arts & Culture
3
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
4
Oklahoma Contemporary Arts Center Inc

Oklahoma contemporary arts center encourages artistic expression in all its forms through education,exhibitions, and performance.

Arts & Culture
5
Tulsa School of Arts and Sciences

The mission of tsas middle and high school is to provide students a multi-strand liberal arts education in a safe, supportive, individualized and challenging school environment through a college preparatory curriculum.

Education
6
Sooner Theatre of Norman Inc

The mission of The Sooner Theatre is to change lives, offer diverse perspectives and create a cultural connection to the community through the performing arts and arts education.

Arts & Culture
7
Tulsa Symphony Orchestra Inc

Entertains, educates, heals, and inspires through musical excellence, innovation, and collaboration.

Arts & Culture
8
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
9
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
10
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
11
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
12
Craft Production of Oklahoma Inc Formerly Theatre Arts Production Co

To provide a theatrical, educational broadway level experience for the youth and audiences of tulsa, oklahoma.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arts & Humanities Council of Tulsa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riverfield Country Day School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLLAND HALL: $189,000 · OtherHOLLAND HALLTulsa Botanic Garden: $76,000 · OtherTulsa Botanic GardenALL SOULS UNITARIAN CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherALL SOULS UNITARIAN CHURCH108 Contemporary: $37,000 · Other108 ContemporaryARTS & HUMANITIES COUNCIL OF TULSA INC: $34,000 · OtherARTS & HUMANITIES COUNCIL OF TULSA INCTulsa Girls Art School: $25,000 · OtherSt Patrick's Episocpal Church: $24,000 · OtherSt Patrick's Episcopal Church: $24,000 · OtherLiving Arts of Tulsa Inc: $22,000 · Other+3 more: $16,000 · OtherThe University of Tulsa: $64,000 · EducationThe University …Riverfield Country Day School: $23,000 · EducationRiverfield Coun…Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $35,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHOREGUS PRODUCTIONS INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureARTS ALLIANCE TULSA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureOklahoma Visual Arts Coalition: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$487,000Education$87,000Human Services$36,000Arts & Culture$16,000Philanthropy$10,000Housing & Shelter$5,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe University of Tulsa: $64,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $35,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetARTS & HUMANITIES COUNCIL OF TULSA INC: $34,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetRiverfield Country Day School: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLiving Arts of Tulsa Inc: $22,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetOklahoma Visual Arts Coalition: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARTS & HUMANITIES COUNCIL OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds Riverfield Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds Living Arts of Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHOREGUS PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS ALLIANCE TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Visual Arts Coalition ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA PROJECT THEATRE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK22.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Zink Family Foundation · Judith and Jean Adams Charitable Foundation · Stuart Family Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cecil and Virgie Burton Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cecil and Virgie Burton Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cecil and Virgie Burton Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Cecil and Virgie Burton Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cecil and Virgie Burton’s filings →

More from the funding graph