Skip to content
Cdh International Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Cdh International Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$252kEducation$200kHealth$180kAnimals$30kHuman Services$25kEnvironment$25kCivil Rights$25kCommunity Improvement$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $46k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARMELITE MONASTERY$50,000
REGINA PACIS CHURCH$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$50,000
EQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC$31,000
GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 70% of grant dollars ($587k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 30% that went abroad ($252k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 30% of all-years giving ($252k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$252k · 5 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$672k · 4 repeat orgs$413k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$672k
$232k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+37%

Still filing today

75%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $200k · revenue +48%
  • TB
    THE BRONX VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2024 · $180k · revenue +2%
  • GI
    GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • SO
    Special Operations Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +55%
  • CA
    CATHOLIC ACTION CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Foundation for the Horse Fka the Aaep Foundation Inc

Founded in 1994, the foundation for the horse is governed and stewarded by equine veterinarians. our mission to improve the health and welfare of horses is supported by the expertise of many world-renowned caregivers and researchers,…

Human Services
2
United States Equestrian Federation Inc

The united states equestrian federation's mission is to provide access to and increase participation in equestrian sports at all levels by ensuring fairness, safety, and enjoyment.

Recreation & Sports
3
Kentucky Thoroughbred Owners & Breeders Foundation Inc

Kentucky thoroughbred owners & breeders foundation, inc. (ktob foundation) supports and funds equine research, in particular research to study and find a prevention or cure to the condition in horses commonly known as mare reproductive…

Animals
4
The Jockey Club

The organization is dedicated to the improvement of thoroughbred breeding and racing. It fulfills that mandate by serving many segments of the industry through its subsidiary companies and by providing support to a wide range of industry…

Recreation & Sports
5
Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation Inc

The organization is committed to the advancement of research to enhance the safety and health of the horse.

Animals
6
American Association of Equine Practitioners

To improve the health and welfare of the horse, to further the professional development of its members, and to provide resources and leadership for the benefit of the equine industry.

—
7
Equitarian Initiative

To sustainably improve the health and welfare of working horses, donkeys, mules, and their families around the world.

International
8
Racing Medication and Testing Consortium

The mission of the consortium is to engage in research, education, and advocacy for science-based initiatives that promote the health and safety of the racehorse and the integrity of competition.

Animals
9
Florida Thoroughbred Breeders Assoc Inc

To promote the thoroughbred horse industry in the state of florida.

—
10
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
11
Harness Racing Museum and Hall of Fame

The harness racing museum & hall of fame is dedicated to comprehensive, active and authoritative support and promotion of the standardbred racing through documentation and preservation of the history and traditions of this american-born…

Arts & Culture
12
National Reining Horse Association

The corporation is formed to promte and encourage public interest in agricultural and ranching through reining horse shows and programs; to develop standards and performance and judging of reinging horses; to encourage the development and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Green Beret Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hawaii Saddle Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CDH INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INDIA: $252,000 · OtherTHE CDH INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INDIATHE BRONX VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 · OtherTHE BRONX VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientREGINA PACIS CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherREGINA PACIS CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARMELITE MONASTERY: $50,000 · OtherCARMELITE MONASTERYEQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $31,000 · OtherCATHOLIC ACTION CENTER: $25,000 · OtherCATHOLIC EDUCATION: $25,000 · OtherTexas A&M Foundation: $200,000 · EducationTexas A&M FoundationSpecial Operations Fund: $50,000 · EducationSpecial Operations FundGRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC: $40,000 · Public BenefitRETIRED RACEHORSE PROJECT LTD: $20,000 · AnimalsNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION: $10,000 · AnimalsGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesFAYETTE ALLIANCE INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BARTELS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHAWAII SADDLE CLUB: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$713,000Education$250,000Public Benefit$40,000Animals$30,000Human Services$25,000Community Improvement$20,000Arts & Culture$5,000Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $200,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRONX VETERANS MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $180,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSpecial Operations Fund: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEQUESTRIAN EVENTS INC: $31,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREEN BERET FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRETIRED RACEHORSE PROJECT LTD: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BARTELS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetHAWAII SADDLE CLUB: $2,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cdh International Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cdh International Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cdh International Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cdh International Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cdh International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home