Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ccyl Chang Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Religion$36kEducation$14kInternational$4kHuman Services$2kHealth$500
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$205k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Orange County Christian Evangelical Church$21,400
RENEWAL FOUNDATION INC$4,600
BLESSINGS CULTURAL MISSION FELLOWSHIP$1,000
Vision Team International$800
CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION$700
Chinese Christian Herald Crusades$500
St jude children's research hospital$500
Global Life Enrichment Center$500
Samaritan's Purse$500
Passing On Mission$500
China Soul for Christ Foundation$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Chinese Christian Herald Crusades: $500 → 14%Chinese Christian Herald Crusades: $500 → 14%Chinese Christian Herald Crusades: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$55k · 10 repeat orgs$800 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$55k
$300

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+18%

Still filing today

70%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RENEWAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +129%
  • CC
    CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +2%
  • PO
    PASSING ON MISSION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • TL
    TOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE
    one grant, 2023 · $300 · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jessica Yoon Ministries

Spread the Christianity

Religion
2
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
3
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
4
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
5
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
6
Vision for Asia

Christian Ministry Activities

Religion
7
Chinese Christianity Network Tv

The purpose of this organization is to let people know jesus is the son of god, through holy sprit, for those who believe in him will not be perished, but will have everlasting life.

Religion
8
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
9
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
10
Chinese Christian Fellowship Intl

It is ccf's objective to establish training centers in communities all over the world teaching biblical truth to produce in all who are called to be leaders and participants lives in christ's fullness: 1. study god's word with life…

Religion
11
Chinese Worldwide Gospel Mission

To spread gospel and provide Christianity training to the people in China through volunteer pastors and church elders from the United States.

Religion
12
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese Christian Herald Crusades Inc and the most unlike its peers is China Soul for Christ Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ORANGE COUNTY CHRISTIAN EVANGELICAL CHURCH INC — $26,000 · OtherORANGE COUNTY CHRISTIAN EVANGELICAL CHURCH INCBLESSINGS CULTURAL MISSION FELLOWSHIP — $3,000 · OtherBLESSINGS CULTURAL MISSION FELLOWSHIPGLOBAL LIFE ENRICHMENT CENTER — $1,500 · OtherRENEWAL FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 · EducationRENEWAL FOUNDATION INCVISION TEAM INTERNATIONAL (USA) INC — $2,600 · ReligionVISION TEAM INTERNA…CHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC — $2,400 · ReligionCHINESE CHRISTIAN M…CHINA SOUL FOR CHRIST FOUNDATION — $1,600 · ReligionCHINA SOUL FOR CHRI…PASSING ON MISSION — $1,500 · ReligionPASSING ON MISSIONSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,300 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE+1 more — $300 · ReligionCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 · Health
Other$30,500Education$14,000Religion$9,700Human Services$1,500Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRENEWAL FOUNDATION INC — $14,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetVISION TEAM INTERNATIONAL (USA) INC — $2,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHINESE CHRISTIAN MISSION INC — $2,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHINA SOUL FOR CHRIST FOUNDATION — $1,600 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHINESE CHRISTIAN HERALD CRUSADES INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPASSING ON MISSION — $1,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE — $300 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ccyl Chang Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph