Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cc & Sandy Yee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Education$68kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kArts & Culture$19kHealth$15kHuman Services$12kCommunity Improvement$3kHousing & Shelter$3kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHINESE HOSPITAL$10,000
LEE FONG YEE TONG ASSOCIATION$3,000
MILLS PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$2,000
YEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION$2,000
BAHT WOR CHARITY FOUNDATION$1,600
GOFUNDME REHUA$1,140
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ASIAN PERINATAL ADVOCATES APA$1,000
AMERICAN ASIAN ELDERLY HUMANITARIAN$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MILLS PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%GOLDEN STATE SALMON ASSOCIATION: $20k → 9%UC REGENTS UC IRVINE: $23k → 10%SF CHINATOWN LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%MILLS-PENINSULA HEALTH SERVICE: $200 → 12%KAIPING FENG CAI MIDDLE SCHOOL LA A: $2k → 14%MILLS PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $300 → 7%UC REGENTS UC IRVINE: $23k → 10%CHINESE HOSPITAL: $10k → 10%GOFUNDME REHUA: $1k → 14%ASIAN PERINATAL ADVOCATES APA: $1k → 10%ASIAN PERINATAL ADVOCATES APA: $1k → 10%ASIAN PENINATAL ADVOCATES APA: $1k → 10%ASIAN PENINATAL ADVOCATES APA: $1k → 10%CHINESE HOSPITAL: $100 → 10%CHINESE RAILROAD WORKS HISTORY CENT: $10k → 10%YEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $4k → 10%LEE FONG YEE TONG ASSOCIATION: $3k → 10%LEE FONG YEE TONG ASSOCIATION: $3k → 10%CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CEN: $3k → 10%YEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%YEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $2k → 10%AMERICAN ASIAN ELDERLY HUMANITARIAN: $2k → 10%BAHT WOR CHARITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%SF CHINATOWN YMCA: $1k → 10%BAHT WOR CHARITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%SF GUANGFU ASSN: $1k → 10%AMERICAN ASIAN ELDERLY HUMANITARIAN: $1k → 10%AMERICAN ASIAN ELDERLY HUMANITARIAN: $500 → 10%CHINESE CONSOLIDATED BENEVOLENT ASS: $500 → 10%LEE FONG YEE TONG: $100 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$83k · 9 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$83k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+13%

Still filing today

56%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • YF
    YEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +134%
  • BW
    BAHT WOR CHARITY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue +120%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $21k · revenue +23%
  • GS
    GOLDEN STATE SALMON ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • CR
    CHINESE RAILROAD WORKS HISTORY CENT
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
2
San Francisco Guzheng Music Society
Arts & Culture
3
Chinese American Womens Benevolent Association
Philanthropy
4
Ching Chung Taoist Association of America

To promote the religious and doctrine of taoism in the san francisco bay area.to serve the chinese community by providing taoist master for taoist rituals and ceremony when their family members pass away.to hold meetings for the teachings…

5
Monterey Bay Chinese Association

Provide Chinese Culture and Help to Advance social, economic well-being of Chinese American at Monterey Bay, California.

Arts & Culture
6
Foundation for Chinese Cultural Heritage
Philanthropy
7
Bernard Chiu Charitable Foundation
8
Chinese Consolidated Benevolent Assn

Income to support various community welfare activities, dinner tickets etc. for various charitable organizations

9
Rose Pak Community Fund

To support projects affecting san francisco chinatown and chinese american community

Philanthropy
10
Central Ca Chinese Cultural Association

Raise the awareness of chinese culture, increase the understanding and appreciation the difference between the chinese and westerm cultures, and to enrich the daily life of the central valley's residents.

Community Improvement
11
Chinatown Merchants Association
12
Chinese Hospital Medical Staff

Ensure the quality and safety of care provided at chinese hospital

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese Hospital Association and the most unlike its peers is Baht Wor Charity Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UC REGENTS UC IRVINE — $46,000 · OtherUC REGENTS UC IRVINECHINESE RAILROAD WORKS HISTORY CENT — $10,000 · OtherCHINESE RAILROAD WORKS HISTORY CENTYEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION — $8,000 · OtherYEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATIONLEE FONG YEE TONG ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · OtherLEE FONG YEE TONG ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN ASIAN ELDERLY HUMANITARIAN — $3,500 · OtherSF CHINATOWN LIONS CLUB FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Other+9 more — $9,540 · Other+9 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,700 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…GOLDEN STATE SALMON ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 · EducationGOLDEN STATE SA…CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $10,100 · HealthCHINESE H…MILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,300 · HealthMILLS-PEN…BAHT WOR CHARITY FOUNDATION — $2,600 · Arts & CultureCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$86,040Human Services$20,700Education$20,000Health$12,400Arts & Culture$2,600Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $20,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN STATE SALMON ASSOCIATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION — $8,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetLEE FONG YEE TONG ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetBAHT WOR CHARITY FOUNDATION — $2,600 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds GOLDEN STATE SALMON ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds CHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds YEE FUNG TOY FAMILY ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds LEE FONG YEE TONG ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds BAHT WOR CHARITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER
  • Who funds MILLS-PENINSULA HOSPITAL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cc & Sandy Yee Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph