Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cathedral Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.9MInternational$2.0MHealth$1.7MPhilanthropy$988kHuman Services$900kEducation$613kHousing & Shelter$80kPublic Safety & Disaster$4k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $4k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
$300,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFEBOX FOUNDATION$1,000,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$480,000
FITCHBURG ART MUSEUM$300,000
DENVER ART MUSEUM$100,000
RIVERBEND (FORMERLY LOWELL HOUSE)$100,000
HIJAS DEL CAMPO$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BROOKVIEW HOUSE: $50k → 16%BROOKVIEW HOUSE: $30k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 5 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$5.8M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+32%

Still filing today

80%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FITCHBURG ART MUSEUM
    6× · 2020–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +46% · 37% of their budget
  • DA
    DENVER ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2019–2025 · $300k · revenue +38%
  • BH
    BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $80k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • LH
    LOWELL HOUSE (NAME CHANGED TO RIVERBEND)
    one grant, 2024 · $800k
  • BC
    BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $750k
  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $513k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
2
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Mass Design Art & Technology Institute Inc

Massachusetts Design, Art, and Technology Institute (DATMA) presents impactful contemporary art at the intersection of design, art, and technology, combined with related community learning experiences, to spark creativity, collaboration,…

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
7
The Bronx Museum of the Arts

The bronx museum of the arts is a contemporary art museum that connects diverse audiences to the urban experience through its permanent collection, special exhibitions, education programs, and public and community programming and outreach…

Arts & Culture
8
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
9
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
10
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
11
Boston Ballet Inc

The heart of Boston Ballet is the human experience. Through our living and breathing art, we forge human connections-between artist and attendee, teacher and trainee, friend and newcomer, one's outer and inner self. Dance history is human…

Arts & Culture
12
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fitchburg Art Museum; the most unlike its peers is Hijas Del Campo. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL: $960,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALLOWELL HOUSE (NAME CHANGED TO RIVERBEND): $800,000 · OtherLOWELL HOUSE (NAME CHANGED TO RIVERBEND)BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $750,000 · OtherBOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITALHARVARD COLLEGE: $513,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGELIFEBOX FOUNDATION-1236 SH VANGUARD 500 INDEX FUND ADMIRAL: $495,006 · OtherLIFEBOX FOUNDATION-1236 SH VANGUARD 500 INDEX FUND A…LIFEBOX FOUNDATION-4645 SH VANGUARD TOTAL STOCK MARKET INDEX FUND: $492,835 · OtherLIFEBOX FOUNDATION-4645 SH VANGUARD TOTAL STOCK MARK…+3 more: $297,851 · Other+3 moreFITCHBURG ART MUSEUM: $2,436,876 · Arts & CultureFITCHBURG ART MUSEUMDENVER ART MUSEUM: $300,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM+3 more: $56,000 · Arts & CultureLifebox Foundation Inc: $2,000,000 · PhilanthropyLifebox Foundation IncBROOKVIEW HOUSE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesOREGON BRAVO YOUTH ORCHESTRAS: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentHIJAS DEL CAMPO: $4,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$4,308,692Arts & Culture$2,792,876Philanthropy$2,000,000Human Services$80,000Youth Development$50,000Public Safety & Disaster$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFITCHBURG ART MUSEUM: $2,436,876 over 6y, 37% of budgetLifebox Foundation Inc: $2,000,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $300,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKVIEW HOUSE INC: $80,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetOREGON BRAVO YOUTH ORCHESTRAS: $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetPEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDesign Museum Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FITCHBURG ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Lifebox Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON BRAVO YOUTH ORCHESTRAS ↗
  • Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Design Museum Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON ARTS ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HIJAS DEL CAMPO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cathedral Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cathedral Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Brookview House Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Design Museum Foundation Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Peabody Essex Museum Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Fitchburg Art Museum: 2% of income from government
  • Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cathedral’s filings →

More from the funding graph