Skip to content

· Private foundation

Case Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$230k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$185k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of Case Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Nebraska Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

0
’17
3
’18
2
’19
3
’20
3
’21
3
’22
1
’23
1
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$863kEducation$195kReligion$160kFood & Nutrition$60kCommunity Improvement$50kArts & Culture$35kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $185k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$185,000
MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10k → 11%CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $25k → 6%DAVID CITY GOLF CLUB BLDG PROJ: $5k → 9%YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%MCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $30k → 12%WOMEN INVESTING IN NEBRASKA: $2k → 13%NATIONAL CORVETTE MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $15k → 18%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $25k → 6%YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25k → 12%WOMEN INVESTING IN NEBRASKA: $2k → 13%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $10k → 6%ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $25k → 12%WOMEN INVESTING IN NEBRASKA: $2k → 13%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $10k → 6%ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $20k → 12%WOMEN INVESTING IN NEBRASKA: $2k → 13%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $10k → 6%ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $20k → 12%TEAMATES MENTORING PROGRAM: $5k → 13%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $10k → 6%MCCOOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $10k → 6%ST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 12%CULTIVATE RENEWAL LEADERS: $10k → 12%MCCOOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%THE NORRIS INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%THE NORRIS INSTITUTE: $10k → 12%RED WILLOW WESTERN RURAL FIRE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Case Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Case Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$540k · 10 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$540k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+59%

Still filing today

20%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NEBRASKA FFA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $120k · revenue +28%
  • TM
    THE MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN
    7× · 2018–2025 · $100k
  • NC
    NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FUND
    2× · 2020–2022 · $80k

Funded once

  • ME
    MCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +59%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CORVETTE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +47%
  • NC
    NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +138%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
2
Northampton County Area Community College Foundation

The Northampton Community College Foundation, raises, invests and manages private resources for Northampton Community College, it's students, and it's staff.

Education
3
Northeast State Community College Foundation

To promote the cause of higher education and the mission of northeast state community college; to expand educational opportunities; and to acquire, manage, and administer foundation funds to achieve those objectives.

Education
4
Nicolet College Foundation Inc

To provide support for students and programs of nicolet college

—
5
Northeast Iowa Dairy & Agriculture Foundation

Providing progressive outreach for youth, students, farmers, industry and consumers to strengthen and support a strong agriculture community.

Education
6
Nebraska Community College Assoc

Support for community colleges

—
7
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
8
North Dakota Farmers Union Educational Foundation

The purpose of nd farmers educational foundation is to support the north dakota farmers union foundation.

Food & Nutrition
9
Northland Foundation

The northland foundation supports northeastern minnesota people and communities working toward a future where everyone feels they belong and can thrive.

Philanthropy
10
North Dakota University System Foundation

The function of the north dakota university system foundation is to support, enrich, advance and improve higher education in the state of north dakota, and to assist its students, faculty and staff.

Philanthropy
11
North Idaho College Foundation Inc

North idaho college foundation solicits, accepts, and stewards private support to enhance educational excellence and student success at north idaho college. the foundation provides strategic resources for student scholarships, program…

Education
12
North Central State College Foundation

The mission of the North Central State Foundation is to assist the College in providing life long learning opportunities by securing financial and community support.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Norris Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $723,080 · PhilanthropyNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONYORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBAN: $100,000 · OtherTHE MISSIONARY SOCIETY OF ST COLUMBANNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FUND: $80,000 · OtherNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FUNDST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherST PATRICK'S CATHOLIC SCHOOLMCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $30,000 · OtherMCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPMCCOOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherMCCOOK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+6 more: $49,600 · Other+6 moreNEBRASKA FFA FOUNDATION: $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEBRASKA …The Norris Institute: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CORVETTE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationCatholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix: $10,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$748,080Other$454,600Youth Development$120,000Arts & Culture$35,000Education$10,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $723,080 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA FFA FOUNDATION: $120,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetMCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $30,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetYORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetThe Norris Institute: $20,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetNATIONAL CORVETTE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCatholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEBRASKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA FFA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCCOOK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
  • Who funds YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Norris Institute ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CORVETTE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Case Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Case Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Case Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph