Skip to content

· Public charity

Carp 46 No Ca Counties Conf Board- U B of Carp & Join of America

To provide negotiation and grievance services and to act for and on behalf of all local unions and regional councils chartered by the united brotherhood of carpenters and joiners of america in the designated 46 counties.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Employment$220kEducation$114kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kEnvironment$60kCommunity Improvement$29kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$8kSocial Science$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL$15,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A CHANCE IN LIFE: $6k → 17%NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERS RELIEF FUND: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 9 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$414k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+63%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEmploymentEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL
    6× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +40%
  • TU
    THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
    4× · 2019–2022 · $60k · revenue +15%
  • AS
    ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • NC
    NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERS RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue ×12
  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FAIR CONTRACTING
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -2%
  • THE SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +253%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Construction Industry Employers Association Inc

The purpose of the association is to represent its members in the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements with representatives of labor, providing for terms and conditions of employment and the administration of grievances. in…

Community Improvement
2
Los Angelesorange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council

To organize, increase collective bargaining support and publicize labor issues related to the construction industry within los angeles and orange counties.

—
3
National Association of Minority Contractors Northern California

Empowering Minority Contractors and advocating for them in the construction industry.

Community Improvement
4
National Maintenance Agreement Labor- Management Policy Committee

The national maintenance agreements policy committee negotiates and administers the national maintenance agreements, a series of collective bargaining agreements utilized by more than 1,700 industrial contractors who employ members of…

—
5
American Council of Engineering Companies of California

To strengthen California's engineering and surveying business to build a better California.

—
6
Carpenters Industrial Council Ubc

To promote and protect the interest of our membership through collective bargaining, training, and organizing.

—
7
California Construction and Industr Materials Association

To provide members with an instrument through which they may coordinate their efforts to solve problems, establish and maintain business standards, and promote and encourage the use of industry products.

—
8
Assoc of Wall-Ceiling & Carp Ind Inc

To enter into contracts and agreements with various unions on behalf of our members. to engage in poublic relations, education, to protect existing standards within the carpentry industry.

—
9
Association of Union Constructors

Our mission is to act as an advocate for the union construction and maintenance industry advancing the cause through an educated and action-driven membership. we aim to enhance labor-management cooperation, workplace safety and health, and…

—
10
Careers in Construction Sw Washington
Recreation & Sports
11
North Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters

Promote union construction and represent the interests of our members

—
12
Housing Contractors of California

To advance and protect the welfare of trade contractors, suppliers, and related businesses and to represent the position of the trade contractor industry in the California legislative, political, judicial, and regulatory arenas.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Construction Industry Force Account Council; the most unlike its peers is Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL: $125,250 · OtherCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCILNORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERSTHOMAS A MORTON MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $63,500 · OtherNORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERSTHOMAS A MORTON MEMORIAL SCHOLA…ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTION: $50,000 · OtherASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTIONNorthern California Carpenters Regional Council: $33,540 · OtherNorthern California Carpenters Regional CouncilASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $15,500 · Other+2 more: $16,500 · Other+2 moreNORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERS RELIEF FUND: $100,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN CALIFORNIA C…A CHANCE IN LIFEINC: $6,000 · Human ServicesA CHANCE IN LIFEINCTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE: $59,500 · EnvironmentTHE URBAN L…AGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $26,000 · EmploymentAGC CONST…NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FAIR CONTRACTING: $20,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL …WALL AND CEILING ALLIANCE: $20,500 · Community ImprovementILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $7,500 · Community ImprovementTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$304,290Human Services$106,000Environment$59,500Employment$46,000Community Improvement$28,000Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL: $125,250 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERS RELIEF FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERSTHOMAS A MORTON MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $63,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE: $59,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTION: $50,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetNorthern California Carpenters Regional Council: $33,540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWALL AND CEILING ALLIANCE: $20,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FAIR CONTRACTING: $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $15,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetA CHANCE IN LIFEINC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Northern California Carpenters Regional CouncilCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northern California Carpenters Regional Council

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carp 46 No Ca Counties Conf Board- U B of Carp & Join of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carp 46 No Ca Counties Conf Board- U B of Carp & Join of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carp 46 No Ca Counties Conf Board- U B of Carp & Join of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph