· Public charity
Carp 46 No Ca Counties Conf Board- U B of Carp & Join of America
To provide negotiation and grievance services and to act for and on behalf of all local unions and regional councils chartered by the united brotherhood of carpenters and joiners of america in the designated 46 counties.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of CARP 46 NO CA COUNTIES CONF BOARD- U B OF CARP & JOIN OF AMERICA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL | $15,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $106k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL6× · 2019–2024 · $125k · revenue +40%
- TUTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE4× · 2019–2022 · $60k · revenue +15%
- ASASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTION5× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- NCNORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERS RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue ×12
- NANATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FAIR CONTRACTINGone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -2%
THE SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue +253%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the association is to represent its members in the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements with representatives of labor, providing for terms and conditions of employment and the administration of grievances. in…
To organize, increase collective bargaining support and publicize labor issues related to the construction industry within los angeles and orange counties.
Empowering Minority Contractors and advocating for them in the construction industry.
The national maintenance agreements policy committee negotiates and administers the national maintenance agreements, a series of collective bargaining agreements utilized by more than 1,700 industrial contractors who employ members of…
To strengthen California's engineering and surveying business to build a better California.
To promote and protect the interest of our membership through collective bargaining, training, and organizing.
To provide members with an instrument through which they may coordinate their efforts to solve problems, establish and maintain business standards, and promote and encourage the use of industry products.
To enter into contracts and agreements with various unions on behalf of our members. to engage in poublic relations, education, to protect existing standards within the carpentry industry.
Our mission is to act as an advocate for the union construction and maintenance industry advancing the cause through an educated and action-driven membership. we aim to enhance labor-management cooperation, workplace safety and health, and…
Promote union construction and represent the interests of our members
To advance and protect the welfare of trade contractors, suppliers, and related businesses and to represent the position of the trade contractor industry in the California legislative, political, judicial, and regulatory arenas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Construction Industry Force Account Council and the most unlike its peers is Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY FORCE ACCOUNT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERS RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CARPENTERSTHOMAS A MORTON MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTION ↗
- Who funds Northern California Carpenters Regional Council ↗
- Who funds AGC CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WALL AND CEILING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR FAIR CONTRACTING ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN GATE AREA COUNCIL #023 ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds A CHANCE IN LIFEINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Northern California Carpenters Regional Council
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carp 46 No Ca Counties Conf Board- U B of Carp & Join of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.