Skip to content

· Private foundation

Caroline Shipman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Science & Tech$14kArts & Culture$13kHealth$13kReligion$12kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$9kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$262k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hawaii Science and Technology Museum$5,000
Volcano Community Foundation$3,000
The Food Basket$2,000
Salvation Army$1,500
Christian Liberty School$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,100
Hawaii Pacific Parks Association$1,000
Hawaii Care Choices$1,000
Kona Historical Society$1,000
Puna Covenant Church$1,000
UH Foundation Imiloa Center$1,000
Puna Hongwanji Mission$1,000
Hilo Medical Center Foundation$1,000
Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island$1,000
Lyman Museum$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Hawaii Science and Technology Museum: $5k → 15%Hawaii Science and Technology Museum: $5k → 15%Hawaii Science Technology Museum: $4k → 15%UHH Sigma Xi: $3k → 15%Boys and Girls Club of Big Island: $2k → 15%Boys and Girls Club of the Big Isla: $2k → 15%Boys and Girls Club Big Island: $2k → 15%The Food Basket: $2k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $2k → 15%The Food Basket: $2k → 15%Salvation Army: $2k → 15%Salvation Army: $2k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $2k → 15%The Salvation Army: $2k → 15%The Food Basket: $2k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $2k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island: $1k → 15%The Food Basket: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%UH Foundation Imiloa Center: $1k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $1k → 15%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%UH Foundation Imiloa Center: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $1k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Pacific Tsunami Museum: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island: $1k → 15%The Food Basket: $1k → 15%Kona Historical Society: $1k → 15%Volcano Community Foundation: $3k → 15%Puna Hongwanji Mission: $1k → 15%Puna Covenant Church: $1k → 15%Christian Liberty School: $1k → 15%Ke Kula Nawahikalaniopuu: $1k → 15%Ke Kula Nawahikalaniopuu: $1k → 15%Christian Liberty School: $1k → 15%Ke Kula Nawahiokalaniopuu: $1k → 15%Christian Liberty School: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$89k · 16 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$89k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

38%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Hawaii Science and Technology Museum
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +429%
  • HM
    HILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +156%
  • KH
    KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • HS
    Hawaii Science Technology Museum
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Big Island
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
2
Hui Aloha Kiholo

Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.

Arts & Culture
3
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
4
Kauai Historical Society

Our Mission is To collect, preserve, and disseminate the oral, written and pictorial history of Kauai County and to educate ourselves and the public about the history and cultures of Kauai and Niihau.

—
5
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
—
6
Hawaii Book and Music Festival
Arts & Culture
7
Hiikua a Hiialo Cultural Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Ka Ha O Ka Aina
Environment
9
Na Mamo o Kawa

to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.

Environment
10
Na Hoa Aloha O Ka Pu Uhonua O Honaunau

For the benefit and inspiration of ALL, Na Hoa Aloha o ka Pu'uhonua o Honaunau participates with NPS and other partners to protect and preserve cultural and natural resources, guided by the aacestral knowledge of South Kona.

—
11
Ke Ao Halii

The mission is to protect and preserve the natural and cultural resources of the hana moku and the customary and traditional practices of native hawaiians of the region; to preserve and manage the area's natural, cultural, scenic, historic…

Environment
12
Hawaii Maritime Center
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Pacific Parks Association Ltd Fka Hi Natural History Association Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Tsunami Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Salvation Army: $7,350 · OtherSalvation ArmyHawaii Care Choices: $6,850 · OtherHawaii Care ChoicesChristian Liberty School: $6,250 · OtherChristian Liberty SchoolLyman Museum: $6,120 · OtherLyman MuseumPuna Hongwanji Mission: $6,120 · OtherPuna Hongwanji MissionPUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HI: $6,120 · OtherPUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HIVOLCANO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherVOLCANO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $4,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHawaii Science Technology Museum: $4,000 · OtherHawaii Science Technology MuseumIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,200 · Other+3 more: $6,000 · Other+3 moreHawaii Science and Technology Museum: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHawaii Science and …KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,120 · Arts & CultureKONA HISTORICAL SOC…Pacific Tsunami Museum Inc: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePacific Tsunami Mus…THE FOOD BASKET INC: $7,850 · Food & NutritionHILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,350 · PhilanthropyBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG ISLAND: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentHAWAII PACIFIC PARKS ASSOCIATION LTD FKA HI NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION LTD: $2,000 · Environment
Other$63,060Arts & Culture$17,120Food & Nutrition$7,850Philanthropy$6,350Youth Development$5,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC: $7,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $6,350 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,120 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HI: $6,120 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG ISLAND: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII PACIFIC PARKS ASSOCIATION LTD FKA HI NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION LTD: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Tsunami Museum Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hawaii Science and Technology Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC ↗
  • Who funds HILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HI ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII PACIFIC PARKS ASSOCIATION LTD FKA HI NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Tsunami Museum Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Caroline Shipman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Caroline Shipman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Caroline Shipman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Caroline Shipman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Caroline Shipman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph