Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Caroline Shipman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Science & Tech$14kArts & Culture$13kHealth$13kReligion$12kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$9kFood & Nutrition$8kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$262k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hawaii Science and Technology Museum$5,000
Volcano Community Foundation$3,000
The Food Basket$2,000
Salvation Army$1,500
Christian Liberty School$1,100
Individual grant recipient$1,100
Kona Historical Society$1,000
Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island$1,000
Puna Covenant Church$1,000
Hawaii Care Choices$1,000
Hawaii Pacific Parks Association$1,000
Lyman Museum$1,000
UH Foundation Imiloa Center$1,000
Puna Hongwanji Mission$1,000
Hilo Medical Center Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Hawaii Science and Technology Museum: $5k → 15%Hawaii Science and Technology Museum: $5k → 15%Hawaii Science Technology Museum: $4k → 15%UHH Sigma Xi: $3k → 15%Boys and Girls Club of Big Island: $2k → 15%Boys and Girls Club of the Big Isla: $2k → 15%Boys and Girls Club Big Island: $2k → 15%The Food Basket: $2k → 15%Salvation Army: $2k → 15%The Salvation Army: $2k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $2k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $2k → 15%Salvation Army: $2k → 15%The Food Basket: $2k → 15%The Food Basket: $2k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $2k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $1k → 15%Pacific Tsunami Museum: $1k → 15%UH Foundation Imiloa Center: $1k → 15%Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Boys and Girls CLub of the Big Island: $1k → 15%Lyman Museum: $1k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $1k → 15%UH Foundation Imiloa Center: $1k → 15%The Food Basket: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%The Food Basket: $1k → 15%Hawaii Care Choices: $1k → 15%The Salvation Army: $1k → 15%Hilo Medical Center Foundation: $1k → 15%Kona Historical Society: $1k → 15%Volcano Community Foundation: $3k → 15%Puna Hongwanji Mission: $1k → 15%Puna Covenant Church: $1k → 15%Ke Kula Nawahikalaniopuu: $1k → 15%Christian Liberty School: $1k → 15%Ke Kula Nawahiokalaniopuu: $1k → 15%Christian Liberty School: $1k → 15%Ke Kula Nawahikalaniopuu: $1k → 15%Christian Liberty School: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$89k · 16 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$89k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

38%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    Hawaii Science and Technology Museum
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +429%
  • HM
    HILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +156%
  • KH
    KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • HS
    Hawaii Science Technology Museum
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Club of Big Island
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
E Kupaku Ka Aina - the Hawaii Land Restoration Institute
Environment
2
Hui Aloha Kiholo

Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.

Arts & Culture
3
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
4
Kauai Historical Society

Our Mission is To collect, preserve, and disseminate the oral, written and pictorial history of Kauai County and to educate ourselves and the public about the history and cultures of Kauai and Niihau.

5
The Haiku Aina Permaculture Initiative
6
Hawaii Book and Music Festival
Arts & Culture
7
Hiikua a Hiialo Cultural Foundation
Arts & Culture
8
Ka Ha O Ka Aina
Environment
9
Na Mamo o Kawa

to rehabilitate, curate, and steward the natural and cultural resources of Kawa to honor the past, benefit the present, and preserve for the future generations of Ka'u, the Island of Hawaii and all humankind.

Environment
10
Na Hoa Aloha O Ka Pu Uhonua O Honaunau

For the benefit and inspiration of ALL, Na Hoa Aloha o ka Pu'uhonua o Honaunau participates with NPS and other partners to protect and preserve cultural and natural resources, guided by the aacestral knowledge of South Kona.

11
Ke Ao Halii

The mission is to protect and preserve the natural and cultural resources of the hana moku and the customary and traditional practices of native hawaiians of the region; to preserve and manage the area's natural, cultural, scenic, historic…

Environment
12
Hawaii Maritime Center

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Pacific Parks Association Ltd Fka Hi Natural History Association Ltd and the most unlike its peers is Pacific Tsunami Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Salvation Army — $7,350 · OtherSalvation ArmyHawaii Care Choices — $6,850 · OtherHawaii Care ChoicesChristian Liberty School — $6,250 · OtherChristian Liberty SchoolLyman Museum — $6,120 · OtherLyman MuseumPuna Hongwanji Mission — $6,120 · OtherPuna Hongwanji MissionPUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HI — $6,120 · OtherPUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HIVOLCANO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherVOLCANO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $4,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHawaii Science Technology Museum — $4,000 · OtherHawaii Science Technology MuseumIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,200 · Other+3 more — $6,000 · Other+3 moreHawaii Science and Technology Museum — $10,000 · Arts & CultureHawaii Science and …KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,120 · Arts & CultureKONA HISTORICAL SOC…Pacific Tsunami Museum Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CulturePacific Tsunami Mus…THE FOOD BASKET INC — $7,850 · Food & NutritionHILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $6,350 · PhilanthropyBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG ISLAND — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentHAWAII PACIFIC PARKS ASSOCIATION LTD FKA HI NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION LTD — $2,000 · Environment
Other$63,060Arts & Culture$17,120Food & Nutrition$7,850Philanthropy$6,350Youth Development$5,000Environment$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FOOD BASKET INC — $7,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $6,350 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $6,120 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HI — $6,120 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG ISLAND — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII PACIFIC PARKS ASSOCIATION LTD FKA HI NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION LTD — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPacific Tsunami Museum Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hawaii Science and Technology Museum
  • Who funds THE FOOD BASKET INC
  • Who funds HILO MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PUNA COVENANT CHURCH KEAAU HI
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE BIG ISLAND
  • Who funds HAWAII PACIFIC PARKS ASSOCIATION LTD FKA HI NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION LTD
  • Who funds Pacific Tsunami Museum Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Caroline Shipman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Caroline Shipman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Caroline Shipman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph