Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carol Tandy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Food & Nutrition$268kHuman Services$41kHealth$33kEducation$29kHousing & Shelter$28kYouth Development$11kCivil Rights$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$34,600
MONTE CASSINO SCHOOL$25,000
TANDY FAMILY YMCA$10,000
IRON GATE AT TRINITY$6,000
RESONANCE$4,400
LIFE SENIOR SERVICES$1,000
SOUTHERN HILLS COUNTRY CLUB$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $3k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $1k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $500 → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $9k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$399k · 12 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$399k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+75%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $234k · revenue +33%
  • IRON GATE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +136%
  • HO
    Health Outreach Prevention Education Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $32k · revenue +327%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • The University of Tulsa
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +8%
  • OS
    OKLAHOMA SMOKE DIVER ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
2
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
3
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
4
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
5
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
6
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

8
Tulsa Police Foundation Inc

Raise awareness and funds for needs of the Tulsa Police Department that will benefit officers and citizens in the city of Tulsa. A joint effort between law enforcement and the citizens of Tulsa to enhance the safety and security of each.

Crime & Legal
9
Family Promise of Tulsa County Inc

Poverty alleviation/homelessness prevention

Housing & Shelter
10
Tulsa County Medical Society Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to develop, create, and maintain programs in the tulsa area designed for health promotion, health education, and disease prevention and treatment through the professional expertise and engagement of the…

Philanthropy
11
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
12
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Day Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southern Hills Country Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $233,770 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INCMONTE CASSINO SCHOOL INC — $25,000 · OtherMONTE CASSINO SCHOOL INCRESONANCE — $23,660 · OtherRESONANCETHE YMCA — $17,000 · OtherTHE YMCATANDY FAMILY YMCA — $10,000 · OtherTANDY FAMILY YMCASALVATION ARMY — $5,000 · OtherOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC — $4,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,430 · Other+7 more — $7,050 · Other+7 moreIRON GATE INC — $34,050 · ReligionHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc — $32,292 · Health+1 more — $1,000 · HealthTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $28,340 · Housing & ShelterYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $10,600 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $8,500 · Human Services+1 more — $500 · Human ServicesThe University of Tulsa — $3,950 · Education+1 more — $100 · Education
Food & Nutrition$233,770Other$96,890Religion$34,050Health$33,292Housing & Shelter$28,340Human Services$19,600Education$4,050

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $233,770 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIRON GATE INC — $34,050 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc — $32,292 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $28,340 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $10,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMANS FOR EQUALITY INC — $4,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $3,950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarmony Project Tulsa — $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN HILLS COUNTRY CLUB — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA FIRE MUSEUM INC — $400 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUTH DEVELOPMENT OF TULSA INC — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTulsa Library Trust — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK27.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carol Tandy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph