Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carol and Gene Zamler Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2023
22
Grants FY2023
4
States reached
$28k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of Carol and Gene Zamler Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Detroit, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Carol and Gene Zamler Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $91k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
4
’18
6
’19
7
’20
10
’21
7
’22
11
’23
8
’24
9
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$377kInternational$85kHealth$81kRecreation & Sports$68kReligion$62kYouth Development$35kEducation$27kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k17 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $74k
$1,250
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$28,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$13,000
ISRAEL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABL$12,500
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$10,000
HENRY FORD HOSPITAL$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL$3,450
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMM$2,500
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,500
ORT AMERICA$1,925
JARC$1,800
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER$1,250
KIDS KICKING CANCER$1,000
AISH HA TORAH DETROIT$613
Individual grant recipient$500
YESHIVA BETH YEHUDAH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%JARC: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 56% of Carol and Gene Zamler Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Carol and Gene Zamler Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$692k · 27 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
8

Total granted

$692k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+4%

Still filing today

26%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    4× · 2021–2025 · $50k · revenue +39%
  • OA
    ORT AMERICA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • VC
    VARIETY CHILDRENS CHARITY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU-EL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • TB
    TEMPLE BETH EL
    one grant, 2021 · $320
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
5
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
9
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Mesorah Heritage Foundation

The foundation's mission is to research, locate, translate, and create jewish religious, literary, biblical, and talmudic works for religious, scholarly and cultural purposes for the general public.

Arts & Culture
12
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Aish Hatorah Detroit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION: $298,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONFRIENDS OF THE IDF: $81,425 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE IDFTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT: $55,328 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROITAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SPORTS C: $42,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL SPORTS CFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $40,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE+28 more: $111,897 · Other+28 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $145,800 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION O…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $50,050 · HealthKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $3,700 · Health+4 more: $1,600 · HealthJARC: $23,300 · Human ServicesHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $6,450 · Arts & CultureAISH HATORAH DETROIT: $2,833 · ReligionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $250 · Civil Rights
Other$629,650Philanthropy$146,800Health$55,350Human Services$23,300Arts & Culture$6,450Religion$2,833Civil Rights$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $145,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $50,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJARC: $23,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $8,425 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $6,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $3,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds JARC ↗
  • Who funds ORT AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds AISH HATORAH DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family FoundationMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Jewish Federation of Detroit · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carol and Gene Zamler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carol and Gene Zamler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carol and Gene Zamler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph