Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carner Family Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$318k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$250kInternational$200kReligion$144kPublic Safety & Disaster$71kFood & Nutrition$55kArts & Culture$30kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $158k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE$100,000
THE LAST SHALL BE FIRST$57,500
EAST AURORA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$46,000
LOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC$40,000
PROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP$35,000
ERIE MOUNTED DIVISION INC$25,000
LAFAYETTE HIGH SCHOOL$5,225
INDIGENOUS LITERACY FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF FIJI HEALTH NZ INC$4,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $220k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $180k → 13%LOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $40k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$554k · 4 repeat orgs$241k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$554k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LT
    LOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $220k · revenue +1%
  • GE
    GIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $200k · revenue +31%
  • TL
    THE LAST SHALL BE FIRST
    3× · 2022–2025 · $124k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TI
    THE IBMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -2%
  • FW
    FEEDMORE WNY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caroga Lake Vol Fire Company Inc

To provide fire protection services for the residents in the towns of caroga, bleecker, and piseco in upstate new york.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
Erie Yacht Club

The purposes of the erie yacht club are to maintain, develop, and enlarge the facilities for yachting and boating, to encourage and develop yachting and other aquatic sports, to promote social recreational activities connected therewith,…

—
3
Bay Ridge Volunteer Fire Company Inc

The fire company provides fire protection to the town of queensbury, new york.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Buffalo Maritime Center Inc

The buffalo maritime center's mission is to provide everyone the opportunity to experience the hoy of being on the water, to learn maritime history, and to achieve higher levels of craftmanship.

Recreation & Sports
5
Erie Yacht Club Foundation Inc

The Foundations mission is to advance maritime education promote youth and intercollegiate sailing and expand opportunities in boating.

Recreation & Sports
6
Black River Fire Department Inc

To protect persons and property from injury, loss, damage or destruction by fire.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
East Rockaway Fire Department Inc

Fire protection and prevention services.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Rogue Farm Corps

Rogue nbsp;farm nbsp;corps nbsp;trains nbsp;and nbsp;equips nbsp;the nbsp;next nbsp;generation nbsp;of nbsp;farmers nbsp;and nbsp;ranchers nbsp;through nbsp;hands-on nbsp;educational nbsp;programs nbsp;and nbsp;the nbsp;preservation…

Environment
9
Fredonia Valley Riding Club
Recreation & Sports
10
Ephraim Yacht Club Inc

Provide outreach programs, equipment and facilities, and funding for sailing education, training, and competition so that youth, as well as adults, may learn the life skills and values important in being active and productive members of…

Recreation & Sports
11
Buffalo & Erie County Industrial Land Development Corporation

Buffalo and erie county industrial land development corporation (ildc) is an issuer of tax-exempt bond financing for not-for-profit entities. additionally, it was incorporated for the purpose of participating in the acquisition and…

Community Improvement
12
Pound Ridge Land Conservancy Inc

To conserve land in the town of pound ridge, ny.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Providence Farm Collective Corp; the most unlike its peers is Erie Mounted Division Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LAST SHALL BE FIRST: $123,643 · OtherTHE LAST SHALL BE FIRSTERIE MOUNTED DIVISION INC: $25,000 · OtherERIE MOUNTED DIVISION INCIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFEEDMORE WNY INC: $20,000 · OtherFEEDMORE WNY INCFRIENDS OF FIJI HEALTH: $20,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF FIJI HEALTHFRIENDS OF FIJI HEALTH NZ INC: $10,250 · OtherROYCROFT CAMPUS CORPORATION: $10,000 · OtherNATIVITY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherFAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $15,225 · Other+3 moreLOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $220,000 · Human ServicesLOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING C…GIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $200,000 · InternationalGIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIV…EAST AURORA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $46,000 · Public Safety & DisasterPROVIDENCE FARM COLLECTIVE CORP: $35,000 · Food & NutritionTHE IBMA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$264,118Human Services$220,000International$200,000Public Safety & Disaster$46,000Food & Nutrition$35,000Arts & Culture$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOTHLORIEN THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $220,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetGIRLS EDUCATION COLLABORATIVE INC: $200,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetTHE IBMA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetYOUTH SAILING FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROYCROFT CAMPUS CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFAMILY LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo IncNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Greater Buffalo Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carner Family Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carner Family Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph