Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$100,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$166M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECH$100,000
EDNOVATE$100,000
NORTHERN CASS PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST$100,000
NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUC$100,000
CSC OF EASTERN HANCOCK COUNTY$100,000
CALIFORNIA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT$100,000
COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF HENRICO COU$100,000
AKRON PUBLIC SCHOOLS$100,000
MONROE CENTRAL SCHOOL CORPORTATION$100,000
NORTHEAST ACADEMY FOR AEROSPACE$100,000
PORTAGE SCHOOL OF LEADERS$100,000
CANON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$100,000
ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$100,000
SPRINGFILED EMPOWERMENT ZONE$100,000
ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SCHOOLS THAT LEAD INC: $6k → 10%CALIFORNIA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 12%BUILDING 21: $100k → 22%SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100k → 7%WEST ED: $444k → 10%HIGH TECH HIGH: $5k → 11%EDNOVATE: $100k → 14%NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUC: $100k → 17%AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $10k → 10%CENTER FOR APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECH: $100k → 16%ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 16%GRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100k → 11%PIPER SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 16%LIBERTY 53 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 8%CROSSTOWN HIGH: $100k → 17%MOORESVILLE GRADED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 9%NORTHEAST ACADEMY FOR AEROSPACE: $100k → 15%CANON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100k → 17%CSC OF EASTERN HANCOCK COUNTY: $100k → 5%CONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOOL CORPOR: $100k → 13%PORTAGE SCHOOL OF LEADERS: $100k → 13%MONROE CENTRAL SCHOOL CORPORTATION: $100k → 15%PURDUE POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOLS: $100k → 16%AKRON PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100k → 13%NORTHERN CASS PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST: $100k → 12%ROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $100k → 8%COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF HENRICO COU: $100k → 9%JAMIES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 29%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ND
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
DE
KS
TN
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTED — $444,345 · OtherWESTEDAldine Independent School District — $100,000 · OtherCSC OF EASTERN HANCOCK COUNTY — $100,000 · OtherPIPER SCHOOL DISTRICT — $100,000 · OtherCOUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF HENRICO COU — $100,000 · OtherLIBERTY 53 SCHOOL DISTRICT — $100,000 · OtherCONCORD COMMUNITY SCHOOOL CORPOR — $100,000 · OtherPURDUE POLYTECHNIC HIGH SCHOOLS — $100,000 · OtherCANON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $100,000 · OtherNEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUC — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherAKRON PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT — $100,000 · OtherNORTHERN CASS PUBLIC SCHOOL DIST — $100,000 · OtherPORTAGE SCHOOL OF LEADERS — $100,000 · OtherROANOKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 · OtherCENTER FOR APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECH — $100,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ACADEMY FOR AEROSPACE — $100,000 · OtherMOORESVILLE GRADED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $100,000 · OtherGRAND RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 · OtherMONROE CENTRAL SCHOOL CORPORTATION — $100,000 · Other+3 more — $45,000 · OtherBUILDING 21 — $100,000 · EducationBUILDING 21SPRINGFIELD EMPOWERMENT ZONE PARTNERSHIP INC — $100,000 · EducationSPRINGFIELD EMPO…SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 · EducationSUMMIT PUBLIC SC…EDNOVATE INC — $100,000 · EducationEDNOVATE INC+2 more — $11,000 · Education
Other$2,489,345Education$411,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBUILDING 21 — $100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetSPRINGFIELD EMPOWERMENT ZONE PARTNERSHIP INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEDNOVATE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH TECH HIGH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUILDING 21
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD EMPOWERMENT ZONE PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds SUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds EDNOVATE INC
  • Who funds SCHOOLS THAT LEAD
  • Who funds HIGH TECH HIGH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Schools FundCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Schools Fund · Gates Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph