Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$328k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$611kRecreation & Sports$480kArts & Culture$333kHuman Services$255kCommunity Improvement$230kYouth Development$187kEducation$170kCrime & Legal$83kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $268k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION$50,000
SPRINGFIELD YOUTH MISSION$25,000
UNITED SENIOR SERVICES$25,000
THE WESTCOTT HOUSE$25,000
SPRINGFIELD PROMISE NEIGHBORHOOD$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION$15,000
SPRINGFIELD CITIZEN POLICE ACADEMY ALUMN$15,000
HARTMAN ROCK GARDEN$15,000
THE HERITAGE CENTER OF CLARK COUNTY$15,000
HOPE MINISTRIES$15,000
LIVING UNTETHERED MINISTRIES$10,000
CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
YMCA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ENCOMPASS CONNECTION CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 39 repeat orgs$759k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
28

Total granted

$2.0M
$654k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+26%

Still filing today

36%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +97%
  • UL
    URBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +1%
  • EU
    ELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BL
    BRET LAYTON TOTAL MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2017 · $214k
  • CC
    CLARK CO CONVENTION FACILITIES
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • OO
    OIC OF CLARK CO
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Springfieldclark County Chamber of Commerce

Part iii, line 1 - to advance important economic development opportunities and issues, to help our members grow their businesses by delivering outstanding opportunities, to connect with each other and the broader community and to partner…

—
2
Inner City Mission of Springfield

The mission of inner city mission is to provide what is needed to help homeless children, their parents, and single women find their way home.

Religion
3
Springfield Center for Independent Livin

Provides independent living services and support to individuals with disabilities; trains and refers personal assistants

—
4
Springfield Area Collegiate Ministr

We believe in creating a space where students can have authentic encounters with christ, find life-long friends and get plugged in with a local church while they are in college.

Religion
5
Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Springfield

Improving economic security through financial education and coaching. Organization vision statement: Financial Freedom for All.

—
6
District Council of Springfield Ohio Society of St Vincent De Paul

To provide assistance to the poor and homeless in Springfield and Clark County Ohio

Human Services
7
Springfield Christian School

Springfield Christian School exists to provide a Christ centered environment in a non-denominational setting where children are valued (cherished) and nurtured to develop a desire to understand Gods will for their lives.

Education
8
Springfield Christian School

Our mission at springfield is to be a unique help to christian parents in the nurture and education of their children. our schedule allows parents to spend more time coming alongside their children and to tailor-fit their child's music,…

Education
9
The Springfield Project

The mission of the springfield project is to unite springfield as a community by working to improve the quality of life in our neighborhoods. the project seeks to empower citizens to develop solutions to problems that they identify in…

Community Improvement
10
Spring City Free Public Library

Public library

—
11
Springfield Jewish Community Center Inc

The springfield jcc enriches community and nurtures wellness through physical, intellectual, social and spiritual programs and services. the jcc is guided by jewish values, welcoming and respecting people of all abilities, ages,…

Recreation & Sports
12
Christ for Youth Charities Foundation Inc

Provide grants to charitable organizations to provide religious and social services to disadvantaged youth.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Springfield City Youth Mission; the most unlike its peers is Aspire P16 Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICT: $360,000 · OtherNATIONAL TRAIL PARKS AND RECREATION DISTRICTBRET LAYTON TOTAL MINISTRIES: $214,400 · OtherBRET LAYTON TOTAL MINISTRIESCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION: $120,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY: $107,450 · OtherCLARK CO CONVENTION FACILITIES: $75,000 · OtherSPRINGFIELD YOUTH MISSION: $70,000 · Other+54 more: $1,111,500 · Other+54 moreSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART: $250,000 · Arts & CultureSPRINGFIEL…THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY: $60,000 · ReligionURBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES: $60,000 · ReligionBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $20,000 · ReligionCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EducationCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $35,000 · EducationASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE: $20,000 · EducationROGER E BOOMERSHINE SKILL CENTER INC: $15,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION OF SPRINGFIELD-CLARK COUNTY: $70,000 · Community ImprovementON-THE-RISE: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN: $35,000 · Food & NutritionSPRINGFIELD SOUP KITCHEN: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,058,350Arts & Culture$250,000Religion$140,000Education$115,000Community Improvement$70,000Youth Development$70,000Food & Nutrition$55,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART: $250,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION OF SPRINGFIELD-CLARK COUNTY: $70,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY: $60,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetURBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES: $60,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetON-THE-RISE: $40,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $37,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN: $35,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetCLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION: $35,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE: $20,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetSPRINGFIELD SOUP KITCHEN: $20,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROGER E BOOMERSHINE SKILL CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 36% of budgetSPRINGFIELD CITY YOUTH MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetENCOMPASS CONNECTION CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCHILDRENS RESCUE CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION OF SPRINGFIELD-CLARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE NEHEMIAH FOUNDATION OF SPRINGFIELD/CLARK COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LIGHT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ELDERLY UNITED OF SPRINGFIELD & CLARK COUNTY OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CLARK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ON-THE-RISE ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD CITIZENS POLICE ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON STREET OASIS COMMUNITY GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds CLARK COUNTY LITERACY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE P16 COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OESTERLEN - SERVICES FOR YOUTH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Springfield FoundationOH32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Springfield Foundation · Harry and Violet Turner 95 Charitable Trust · Della Selsor Tr Uw · Community Hospital Health Services Foundation · The United Way of Clark Champaign & Madison Counties Inc · Assurant Foundation · The Nehemiah Foundation of Springfield/Clark County · Shouvlin Foundation · Wilson Sheehan Foundation · Springfield Eagles Charity Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carleton F and Ruth T Davidson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph