· Private foundation
Carl J Minnig Foundation
Its FY2019 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WELD FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $2,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $2,000 |
| FRIENDS OF A WOMANS PLACE | $2,000 |
| DENVER RESCUE MISSION | $2,000 |
| CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH | $2,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| ST JOHN NEUMAN REGIONAL CATHOLIC S | $2,000 |
| MAKE A WISH COLORADO | $2,000 |
| AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $1,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,000 |
| FORT BEND RAINBOW ROOM | $1,000 |
| COAST GUARD FOUNATION | $1,000 |
| KIWANIS CLUB OF GREELEY | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +20%
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +125%- WFWELD FOOD BANK2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- UFUMCP FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $3k
- KDKick Drugs Out of America Foundationone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +7%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES USAone grant, 2018 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…
We empower people to overcome barriers and achieve lasting well-being through collaborative behavioral health care and comprehensive support.
To improve the health of children through the provision of high-quality, coordinated programs of patient care, education, research and advocacy.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.
The mission of fresh start women's foundation is to provide access and resources that help women achieve self-sufficiency and use their strength to thrive. we do this work in pursuit of our vision to create unlimited opportunities for…
Invest in kids partners with local communities to ensure the success of evidence-based programs that improve the health and well-being of colorado's youngest children and their families.
To be the trusted partner in all healthcare decisions and to improve health by providing highly accessible, world-class care and services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Weld Legacy Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of a Womans Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WELD FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF A WOMANS PLACE ↗
- Who funds FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Kick Drugs Out of America Foundation ↗
- Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR RESOURCE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Patrick B Roche Memorial Fund Foundation ↗
- Who funds WELD LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Carl J Minnig Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.