Skip to content
Careersource Florida Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Careersource Florida Inc

The florida workforce system connects employers with qualified, skilled talent and floridians with employment and career development opportunities to achieve economic prosperity.

$7.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
67
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$757k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$78MHealth$51kEnvironment$5k
02FY2025 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $816k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+10 grants · $4.8M
$42,781
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POWER DESIGN INC$757,050
EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC$750,000
WELLDYNERX LLC$558,600
HAECO AIRFRAME SERVICES LLC$544,915
HERC RENTALS INC$456,400
KASEYA USS LLC$449,295
BERKOWITZ POLLOCK BRANT ADVISORS & ACCOUNTANTS$405,278
VT MOBILE AEROSPACE ENGINEERING INC$348,600
KEITH AND ASSOCIATES INC$297,000
KELLEY KRONENBERG PA$270,000
XTREME AVIATION LLC$243,000
HNTB CORPORATION$211,500
GOOD GREEK MOVING AND STORAGE$193,500
COMPLETE TURBINE SERVICES LLC$168,000
BANKERS HEALTHCARE GROUP$158,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HERC RENTALS INC: $456k → 11%EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP INC: $750k → 12%WELLDYNERX LLC: $559k → 16%CHIPOLA COLLEGE: $387k → 18%COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $4.0M → 16%WELLDYNERX LLC: $448k → 16%CHIPOLA COLLEGE: $328k → 18%COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $1.2M → 16%DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE: $1.2M → 13%COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $428k → 16%PENSACOLA STATE COLLEGE: $617k → 16%HAECO AIRFRAME SERVICES LLC: $545k → 19%HAECO AIRFRAME SERVICES LLC: $328k → 19%THE SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH CO: $1.2M → 13%THE SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH CO: $824k → 13%VT MOBILE AEROSPACE ENGINEERING INC: $349k → 16%EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE: $4.7M → 10%THE SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $575k → 13%EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE: $3.1M → 10%THE SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $467k → 13%POLK STATE COLLEGE: $1.2M → 16%EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE: $2.2M → 10%THE SCHOOL BOARD OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $460k → 13%POLK STATE COLLEGE: $521k → 16%EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE: $1.0M → 10%FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AT JACKSONVIL: $676k → 14%EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE: $435k → 10%FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE AT JACKSONVIL: $352k → 14%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $3.1M → 11%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $1.8M → 11%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $1.8M → 11%POWER DESIGN INC: $757k → 12%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $1.4M → 11%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $1.3M → 11%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $1.2M → 11%PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE: $400k → 11%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $861k → 11%PARTEX INC: $276k → 11%FLORIDA SOUTHWESTERN STATE COLLEGE: $407k → 11%PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE: $276k → 11%SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE: $450k → 11%SEMINOLE STATE COLLEGE: $429k → 11%KASEYA USS LLC: $449k → 15%BERKOWITZ POLLOCK BRANT ADVISORS & ACCOUNTANTS: $405k → 15%KEITH AND ASSOCIATES INC: $297k → 13%BROWARD COLLEGE: $842k → 13%BROWARD COLLEGE: $425k → 13%THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BROWARD COLLEGE FLORIDA: $368k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67M · 168 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

168 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 140 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

168
322

Total granted

$67M
$7.1M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    Florida Southwestern State College
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12M
  • EF
    EASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $11M
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5.7M

Funded once

  • IR
    INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $1.2M
  • IR
    IBM Research Laboratories
    one grant, 2020 · $197k
  • NL
    NEOGENOMICS LABORATORIES
    one grant, 2024 · $179k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 529 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Florida Southwestern State College: $11,786,977 · OtherFlorida Southwestern State CollegeEASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE: $11,469,177 · OtherEASTERN FLORIDA STATE COLLEGECOLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA: $5,742,450 · OtherCOLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDAST PETERSBURG COLLEGE: $4,152,918 · OtherST PETERSBURG COLLEGESCHOOL DISTRICT OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $3,901,339 · OtherPOLK STATE COLLEGE: $2,613,100 · Other+191 more: $33,930,405 · Other+191 moreMEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $73,529 · HealthUniversity Community Hospital Inc: $51,459 · HealthFLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN INC: $42,781 · Health
Other$73,596,366Health$167,769

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Florida IncFlorida Is for Vetera…American Association …Florida Humanities Co…Floridamakes IncAchieving the Dream I…Folds of Honor Founda…Community Foundation …Johns Hopkins Univers…Tulsa Community Found…Rockefeller Philanthr…
Enterprise Florida IncFL34.3× affinity22 shared granteesties to 5 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Florida Inc · Florida Is for Veterans Inc · American Association of Community Colleges · Florida Humanities Council Inc · Floridamakes Inc · Achieving the Dream Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Tulsa Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Careersource Florida Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Careersource Florida Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida Hospital Waterman Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Memorial Health Systems Inc: 0% of income from government
  • University Community Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 529 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Careersource Florida’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home