Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Floridamakes Inc

To improve the productivity and technological performance of small- and medium-sized manufacturers throughout the state of florida by providing business assessments, business networks, leadership and workforce training, and in-plant consultative engagements.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Public Benefit$1.8MPhilanthropy$1.1MEmployment$428kCommunity Improvement$313kEducation$157kHuman Services$82k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$22,509
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE$22,662
COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$22,509
ST PETERSBURG COLLEGE$20,158
POLK STATE COLLEGE$15,387
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $82k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ILLINOIS MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CENTER: $52k → 14%ILLINOIS MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CENTER: $30k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 93% of Floridamakes Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 5% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Floridamakes Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 11 repeat orgs$174k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$3.8M
$174k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-30%

Still filing today

45%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EmploymentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +148%
  • ED
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF FLORIDA'S SPACE COAST INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $201k · revenue +16%
  • BW
    BREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $156k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • II
    ICAMR INC
    one grant, 2017 · $112k · revenue -33%
  • CP
    CAREERSOURCE PALM BEACH COUNTY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue -30%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $9k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Workforce Development Board of Flagler and Volusia Counties Inc

To be the premier organization for employment and training solutions to the businesses and workforce of volusia and flagler counties. our mission is to provide innovative customized employment and training solutions to support economic…

2
Gulf Coast Workforce Development Board Inc

To provide customized employment and training solutions that facilitate economic prosperity in partnership with education, economic development, chambers of commerce, community-based organizations, local governments and businesses.

Education
3
Central Florida Regional Workforce Development Board Inc

Careersource central florida connects central floridians to careers & develops skilled talent for businesses.

Employment
4
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
5
Central Florida Development Council Inc

Grow an economy based on high-skill, high-wage sustainable businesses. we focus on business recruitment and expansion, business advocacy, facilitating collaborative partnerships and advancing strategic initiatives in central florida's polk…

6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Metro Broward Economic Development Corporation Inc

MBEDCS mission is to be a permanent capital resource in Broward County Florida, and to indirectly contribute to the creation of jobs for low to moderate income individuals

8
Florida International University Research Foundation Inc

The fiu research foundation provides means by which discoveries, inventions, processes, and work products of faculty, staff and students of the university may be patented, developed, applied and utilized in order that the results of such…

Science & Tech
9
Bradenton Area Economic Development Corp

The bradenton area edc works to diversify the local economy by attracting and retaining high-wage jobs for area residents, and connecting established businesses to the resources they need to succeed.

Community Improvement
10
Economic Development Corporation of Sarasota County

To create and foster economic opportunities in collaboration with community and regional partners to diversify, grow and sustain our economy while enhancing our unique, natural and cultural environment.

Community Improvement
11
Careersource Florida Inc

The florida workforce system connects employers with qualified, skilled talent and floridians with employment and career development opportunities to achieve economic prosperity.

Employment
12
Big Bend Jobs and Education Council Inc

The purpose of careersource capital region (cscr) is to provide for enhanced coordination, cooperation, collaboration, and outcomes, by and between the several entities, both public and private, which are involved at the local level in…

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Careersource Palm Beach County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Icamr Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA — $1,500,696 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDAUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA — $309,691 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDAWORKNET PINELLAS INC — $219,328 · OtherWORKNET PINELLAS INCECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF FLORIDA'S SPACE COAST INC — $200,856 · OtherECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF FLORIDA'S SPACE COAST INC+4 more — $186,457 · Other+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,118,776 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RE…BREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC — $155,634 · EmploymentCAREERSOURCE PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $53,422 · EmploymentICAMR INC — $112,072 · Community ImprovementILLINOIS MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CENTER — $82,426 · Human ServicesCOLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $8,704 · Education
Other$2,417,028Philanthropy$1,118,776Employment$209,056Community Improvement$112,072Human Services$82,426Education$8,704

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,118,776 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetWORKNET PINELLAS INC — $219,328 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF FLORIDA'S SPACE COAST INC — $200,856 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetBREVARD WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC — $155,634 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetICAMR INC — $112,072 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetILLINOIS MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE CENTER — $82,426 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCAREERSOURCE PALM BEACH COUNTY INC — $53,422 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $8,704 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Careersource Florida IncFL13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Careersource Florida Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Floridamakes Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 67%
  • Careersource Palm Beach County Inc100% of income from government
  • Icamr Inc67% of income from government
  • University of Central Florida Research Foundation Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph