Skip to content

· Public charity

Capital Health System Foundation Inc

Capital health system foundation, inc.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$4.5MHuman Services$176kEducation$39kPhilanthropy$25kFood & Nutrition$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
trenton health team inc$1,500,000
arm in arm inc$96,000
Rider University$38,871
Smith Family Foundation$25,000
African American Cultural Collab of Mercer CO$10,000
Share My Meals Inc$10,000
Trenton Youth Wrestling & Learning Center$10,000
Howard's Healthy Choices$9,988
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%arm in arm inc: $96k → 11%arm in arm inc: $80k → 11%Share My Meals Inc: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.7M · 3 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$4.7M
$11k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRENTON HEALTH TEAM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2.5M · revenue -16% · 27% of their budget
  • CH
    CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $2.0M · revenue +112%
  • ARM IN ARM INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $176k · revenue -3%

Funded once

  • TF
    trenton fire department
    one grant, 2023 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Mercer County

United Way of Mercer County champions the needs of children and families in our region.

Philanthropy
2
Meals on Wheels in Hunterdon Inc

To assist the homebound elderly/disabled of Hunterdon, New Jersey to maintain their independence by enhancing their nutritional health, thereby avoiding unwanted institutionalization.

Human Services
3
Westminster Foundation At Princeton Nj
—
4
Mount Carmel Guild of Trenton Nj

Through relationships and collaborations forged with dignity and hope, mount carmel guild of trenton assists the community to overcome challenges to decent health, nutrition, housing, and education.

—
5
Task Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc

Founded in 1982, the mission of Trenton Area Soup Kitchen (TASK) is to feed those who are hungry in the Trenton area and provide programs and services to help enhance self-sufficiency and improve quality of life.In addition to preparing…

Food & Nutrition
6
New Jersey Alliance for Culture Change
Health
7
Mercer Street Friends Center

As a multi-faceted human services agency, mercer street friends (msf) dedicated to "nourishing minds and bodies; empowering families and communities," works to reduce hunger and food insecurity, close education gaps, improve the physical…

Human Services
8
Leaderup

Community Services and mentorship

—
9
The Suppers Programs Inc Dba Eating for Your Health

To provide practical, non-judgmental health and nutrition education with a focus on people living and working in low-income communities. Our programs are interactive, hands-on, relevant, and realistic, provided in a supportive environment…

—
10
Jersey Strong Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
12
New Jersey Innovation Institute Inc

We are an innovative research org. dedicated to revitalizing economic development within nj.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share My Meals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smith Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRENTON HEALTH TEAM INC: $2,500,000 · HealthTRENTON HEALTH TEAM INCCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,029,245 · HealthCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM INCARM IN ARM INC: $176,000 · Human ServicesSHARE MY MEALS INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesRIDER UNIVERSITY: $38,871 · EducationSmith Family Foundation Inc: $25,000 · Philanthropytrenton fire department: $10,899 · OtherAfrican American Cultural Collaborative of Mercer: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTRENTON YOUTH WRESTLING AND LEARNING CENTER: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHOWARDS HEALTHY CHOICES INC: $9,988 · Food & Nutrition
Health$4,529,245Human Services$186,000Education$38,871Philanthropy$25,000Other$10,899Arts & Culture$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Food & Nutrition$9,988

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRENTON HEALTH TEAM INC: $2,500,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $2,029,245 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetARM IN ARM INC: $176,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetRIDER UNIVERSITY: $38,871 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmith Family Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAfrican American Cultural Collaborative of Mercer: $10,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetSHARE MY MEALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRENTON YOUTH WRESTLING AND LEARNING CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Princeton Area Community Foundation IncNJ15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · The Burke Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Capital Health System Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Capital Health System Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Trenton Health Team Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Arm in Arm Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Rider University: 1% of income from government
  • Capital Health System Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Capital Health System Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Capital Health System Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Capital Health System’s filings →

More from the funding graph