Loading…
· Public charity
CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC
The organization exists to develop and cultivate philanthropic relationships and support within the community.
$1.7M
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
1
Communities
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$4.5MHuman Services$186kEducation$39kPhilanthropy$25kArts & Culture$10kRecreation & Sports$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$11k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
—
2019
—
2020
—
2022
—
2023
trenton
2024
healthywasteshare mealsfood insecuritywrestlingathletesskills
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $10k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
- trenton health team inc$1,500,000
- arm in arm inc$96,000
- Rider University$38,871
- Smith Family Foundation$25,000
- African American Cultural Collab of Mercer CO$10,000
- Share My Meals Inc$10,000
- Trenton Youth Wrestling & Learning Center$10,000
- Howard's Healthy Choices$9,988
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 3 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
1
Total granted
$4.7M
$11k
Still filing today
100%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
trenton health team inc2× · 2023–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +95% · 27% of their budget- CHCAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM INC5× · 2017–2022 · $2.0M · revenue +112%
arm in arm inc2× · 2023–2024 · $176k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- TFtrenton fire departmentone grant, 2023 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Cooper Health System a New Jersey
To serve, to heal, to educate.
Health
2
Hackensack Meridian Health Inc
The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities.
Health
3
Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital at
The organization provides medically necessary healthcare services to all individuals in a non-discriminatory manner.
Health
4
Rwj Barnabas Health Inc
Rwj barnabas health, inc. operates as the parent entity of a tax-exempt multi-entity healthcare system. the organization coordinates, supervises and ensures the continuation and improvement of the quality of healthcare services in a cost…
Health
5
United Way of Mercer County
United Way of Mercer County champions the needs of children and families in our region.
Philanthropy
6
Hunterdon Medical Center
To restore, preserve & enhance the health of the community by providing a full range of preventive, diagnostic, holistic & therapeutic ip & op hospital & community health services.
Health
7
Community Health Center of Franklin
To care for the health of our community.
Health
8
Meals on Wheels of Mercer County Inc
To assist participants in Mercer County, NJ in maintaining independence, dignity, health & well-being by providing comprehensive nutrician services and helping ease social isolation.
—
9
Atlanticare Health System Inc
The organization is the tax-exempt parent entity of atlanticare health system & affiliates; a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system which includes armc.
Health
10
Princeton Healthcare System a New Jersey
To provide exceptional, compassionate care to enhance the health and wellness of our patients, their families and our community.
Health
11
Eagle Valley Community Foundation
Eagle valley community foundation provides access to programs and resources that support wellness, healthier food and other essential needs in our community while embracing individual dignity and a committment to sustainability and quality.
Philanthropy
12
Deborah Heart and Lung Center
to provide the highest quality heart, lung and vascular care in a collaborative and welcoming environment, while ensuring access for all.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arm in Arm Inc and the most unlike its peers is Smith Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$4,529,245Human Services$186,000Education$38,871Philanthropy$25,000Other$10,899Arts & Culture$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Food & Nutrition$9,988
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds trenton health team inc ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds arm in arm inc ↗
- Who funds Rider University ↗
- Who funds Smith Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds African American Cultural Collab of Mercer CO ↗
- Who funds Share My Meals Inc ↗
- Who funds Trenton Youth Wrestling & Learning Center ↗
- Who funds Howard's Healthy Choices ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Princeton Area Community Foundation IncNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Burke Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation CAPITAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Trenton Health Team Inc — 31% of income from government
- Capital Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: African American Cultural Collab of Mercer CO.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 472589424 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on African American Cultural Collab of Mercer CO, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 38% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Capital Health System Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Capital Health System Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines