Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cape Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$787kArts & Culture$230kPhilanthropy$26kEnvironment$13kAnimals$11kHuman Services$10kHousing & Shelter$10kHealth$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$515k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RADCLIFFE CREEK SCHOOL$50,000
NATIONAL MUSIC FESTIVAL$25,000
BALTIMORE CIVIC FUND$10,000
FRIENDS SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BALTIMORE CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY$5,000
SULTANA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$2,500
HOMELAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERIA$1,000
GUNPOWER RIVERKEEPER$1,000
AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD TRUST$1,000
ANIMAL CARE SHELTER FOR KENT CO$500
CHESTERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE CO$500
SHORE RIVERS$500
WILLIAMS COLLEGE ALUMNI FUND$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DRINK AT THE WELL INC: $5k → 19%DRINK AT THE WELL INC: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MA
PA
NJ
VA
MD
SC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Cape Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 53% of the giving stays in MD; read by stated purpose it is 42% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Cape Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 11% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$910k · 22 repeat orgs$207k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
14

Total granted

$910k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+21%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Williams College
    5× · 2017–2024 · $382k · revenue +87%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $178k · revenue +25%
  • BC
    BALTIMORE CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $100k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • WC
    WILLIAMS COLLEGE HYDE TEACHING
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • KA
    KENT ATTAINABLE HOUSING INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -16%
  • NW
    NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +39%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
2
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

5
Glen Foerd Conservation Corporation

Glen foerd stewards an eclectic riverfront estate for the enjoyment and educational benefit of the community. drawing from the estate's architecture, art, material culture, and history-as well as its gardens and waterways-glen foerd…

Environment
6
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
7
The Waldorf School of Baltimore Inc

The waldorf school of baltimore educates and inspires children to think, act, and feel with depth, imagination, and purpose.

8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
Thomas Jefferson School of Law

The mission of the school is to provide outstanding legal education in a collegial and supportive environment with attention to newly emerging areas of law, particularly those related to technological development, globalization and the…

Education
10
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
11
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
12
Maryland Institute

Degree granting college-maryland institute college of art is a private college dedicated to the education of professional artists and the further advancement of art in the community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Wildlife Federation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr17%18%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr21%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr17%4%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr12%2%35–55yr21%81%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
2,061/16,001

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
21/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Williams College — $381,500 · EducationWilliams CollegeJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $177,500 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYRADCLIFFE CREEK SCHOOL INC — $50,000 · EducationRADCLIFFE CREEK SCHOOL INC+5 more — $47,500 · Education+5 moreWILLIAMS COLLEGE HYDE TEACHING — $100,000 · OtherWILLIAMS COLLEGE HYDE TEACH…NATIONAL MUSIC FESTIVAL — $50,000 · OtherNATIONAL MUSIC FESTIVALBALTIMORE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS — $30,000 · OtherBALTIMORE SCHOOL FOR THE AR…OUTERARTS MARYLAND AKA NATIONAL MUSIC FESTIVAL — $27,380 · OtherOUTERARTS MARYLAND AKA NATI…Individual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN CRESCENT TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $10,000 · Other+19 more — $42,900 · Other+19 moreBALTIMORE CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE CLA…BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $27,000 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE SYM…+5 more — $8,000 · Arts & Culture+5 moreBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyDRINK AT THE WELL INC — $10,005 · Human ServicesKENT ATTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $10,000 · Animals
Education$656,500Other$275,280Arts & Culture$135,000Philanthropy$21,000Human Services$10,005Housing & Shelter$10,000Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWilliams College — $381,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $177,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE CLASSICAL GUITAR SOCIETY INC — $100,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetRADCLIFFE CREEK SCHOOL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BALTIMORE CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN STREET ACADEMY INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDRINK AT THE WELL INC — $10,005 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKENT ATTAINABLE HOUSING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS SCHOOL OF BALTIMORE INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUNPOWDER RIVERKEEPER INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSULTANA EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA DARDEN SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Battlefield Trust — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHORERIVERS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetElijahs Promise Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE WILDLIFE HERITAGE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTERTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD21.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Keith Campbell Foundation for the Environment Inc · Mid Shore Community Foundation Inc · David a Bramble Foundation Inc · The Seip Family Foundation Limited Eevercore Trust CO C/O Ashley Ferriello · The Llandaff Family Trust · Lynn W and Timothy W Peters Family Foundation · Dock Street Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Middendorf Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cape Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Eastern Shore Land Conservancy Inc100% of income from government
  • Kent Attainable Housing Inc100% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc17% of income from government
  • Shorerivers Inc13% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc11% of income from government
  • Sultana Education Foundation Inc8% of income from government
  • Center Stage Associates Inc7% of income from government
  • Elijahs Promise Inc1% of income from government
  • Washington College0% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cape Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cape Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph