Skip to content
Cancer Community Charities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Cancer Community Charities

Contributions to non-profit organizations.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$41kHealth$39kFood & Nutrition$23kCrime & Legal$7k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $61,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $135,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $73,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hayden Senior Center$10,000
Post Falls Food Bank$10,000
Alzheimers Association$8,000
Kootenai Health Foundation$8,000
North Idaho Veterans$7,000
Safety Net$6,500
Chrysalis Inc$6,000
Harmony Ranch$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Safety Net: $7k → 12%Chrysalis Inc: $6k → 10%Safe Passage: $7k → 10%Childrens Village: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 5 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
2

Total granted

$77k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+35%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KOOTENAI HEALTH INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue ×669
  • PF
    POST FALLS FOOD BANK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue -14%
  • GC
    GEM COMMUNITY CITIZENS PROJECT GROUP INC DBA HAYDEN SENIOR CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue -24%

Funded once

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +35%
  • CV
    CANOPY VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senior Citizens Community Center Inc

Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.

Human Services
2
Clearwater Valley Hospital and Clinics Inc

We improve healthcare one patient at a time in a friendly and professional culture committed to superior quality and safety.

Health
3
Idaho Primary Care Association Inc

Ipca supports community health centers in providing high-quality and affordable primary care to all idahoans through training and technical support. ipca keeps health centers current on issues and trends affecting the changing healthcare…

—
4
The Kenney

Operate a continuing care facility for seniors.

Human Services
5
Idaho Veterans Network Corporation

Idaho Veterans Network is a group who advocates, shares information, solves problems for veterans and their families in crisis, and supports each other. This is a place of trust. We are strictly a non-profit volunteer organization with a…

Public Benefit
6
Disability Rights Idaho Inc

The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.

—
7
Jobs Plus Inc Dba Cda Area Economic Development Corp

Promoting economic growth and job creation in Kootenai County by supporting business relocation, retention, expansion, and diversification. Advancing workforce development and collaborating with partners to address key regional challenges…

—
8
Idaho Health Care Association Inc

The idaho health care association, inc. is a member driven association whose mission is to provide the unified voice for the betterment of the idaho nursing home and assisted living care professionals and the residents they serve.

—
9
South Coast Business Employment Corporation

Scbec builds capacity and ensures the long-term success of skilled employees, well run businesses, organizations, and life enriching senior nutrition and social/health activities, and public transportation services on the southern oregon…

Employment
10
Idaho Community Foundation Inc

The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.

Philanthropy
11
Bozeman Senior Social Center

To promote social, recreational, cultural, nutritional, educational, and health-oriented activities among senior citizens of bozeman, montana and the surrounding areas.

Human Services
12
Missoula Area Agency On Aging Inc

Missoula aging services promotes the independence, dignity, and health of older adults and those that care for them through advocacy, education, services, and volunteer opportunities.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safety Net Spokane. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POST FALLS FOOD BANK: $16,000 · OtherPOST FALLS FOOD BANKGEM COMMUNITY CITIZENS PROJECT GROUP INC DBA HAYDEN SENIOR CENTER: $15,500 · OtherGEM COMMUNITY CITIZENS PROJECT GROUP INC DBA HAYDEN S…HARMONY RANCH: $12,500 · OtherHARMONY RANCHIDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $7,000 · OtherIDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INCKOOTENAI HEALTH INC: $18,000 · HealthKOOTENAI HEALTH INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISO…SAFETY NET SPOKANE: $6,500 · Human ServicesSAFETY NET SPOKANEWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER INCCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCANOPY VILLAGE INCCHRYSALIS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCHRYSALIS INC
Other$51,000Health$33,000Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKOOTENAI HEALTH INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPOST FALLS FOOD BANK: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGEM COMMUNITY CITIZENS PROJECT GROUP INC DBA HAYDEN SENIOR CENTER: $15,500 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHRYSALIS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationFirst Interstate Banc…United Way of North I…Idaho Community Found…Amazonsmile Foundation
Innovia FoundationWA17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of North Idaho Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cancer Community Charities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cancer Community Charities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cancer Community Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Cancer Community Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $115k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cancer Community Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home