· Public charity
Cancer Community Charities
Contributions to non-profit organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $61,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $135,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $73,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hayden Senior Center | $10,000 |
| Post Falls Food Bank | $10,000 |
| Alzheimers Association | $8,000 |
| Kootenai Health Foundation | $8,000 |
| North Idaho Veterans | $7,000 |
| Safety Net | $6,500 |
| Harmony Ranch | $6,000 |
| Chrysalis Inc | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KHKOOTENAI HEALTH INC2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue ×669
- PFPOST FALLS FOOD BANK2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue -14%
- GCGEM COMMUNITY CITIZENS PROJECT GROUP INC DBA HAYDEN SENIOR CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue -24%
Funded once
- WCWOMEN'S CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +35%
- CVCANOPY VILLAGE INCone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.
We improve healthcare one patient at a time in a friendly and professional culture committed to superior quality and safety.
Ipca supports community health centers in providing high-quality and affordable primary care to all idahoans through training and technical support. ipca keeps health centers current on issues and trends affecting the changing healthcare…
Operate a continuing care facility for seniors.
Idaho Veterans Network is a group who advocates, shares information, solves problems for veterans and their families in crisis, and supports each other. This is a place of trust. We are strictly a non-profit volunteer organization with a…
The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.
Promoting economic growth and job creation in Kootenai County by supporting business relocation, retention, expansion, and diversification. Advancing workforce development and collaborating with partners to address key regional challenges…
The idaho health care association, inc. is a member driven association whose mission is to provide the unified voice for the betterment of the idaho nursing home and assisted living care professionals and the residents they serve.
Scbec builds capacity and ensures the long-term success of skilled employees, well run businesses, organizations, and life enriching senior nutrition and social/health activities, and public transportation services on the southern oregon…
The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.
To promote social, recreational, cultural, nutritional, educational, and health-oriented activities among senior citizens of bozeman, montana and the surrounding areas.
Missoula aging services promotes the independence, dignity, and health of older adults and those that care for them through advocacy, education, services, and volunteer opportunities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women's Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Safety Net Spokane. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KOOTENAI HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds POST FALLS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GEM COMMUNITY CITIZENS PROJECT GROUP INC DBA HAYDEN SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO VETERANS ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds SAFETY NET SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRYSALIS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of North Idaho Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cancer Community Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cancer Community Charities?
Find your warmest path to Cancer Community Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.