· Private foundation
Campbell Foundation For Charitable Giving
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lubavitch Chabad of Skokie | $108,991 |
| Arava Institute | $25,180 |
| Chabad Center for Jewish Life and L | $15,005 |
| Arie Crown Hebrew Day School | $10,000 |
| Shalva | $10,000 |
| The Chicago Center | $5,400 |
| JCFS Chicago | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,600 |
| Shurat HaDin-Israel Law Center | $1,854 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,818 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,030 |
| Hebrew Theological College | $1,030 |
| Rudlin Torah Academy | $1,030 |
| Gush Etzion Foundation | $1,000 |
| Kosher Troops | $749 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $146k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.
39 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SISHALVA INC6× · 2019–2024 · $140k · revenue +20%
- DYDOR YESHURIM INC4× · 2020–2023 · $80k · revenue +118%
- KJKEHILLAH JEWISH EDUCATION FUND3× · 2019–2021 · $15k · revenue +179%
Funded once
- NBNefesh B'Nefesh Jewish Souls United Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $248k · revenue +219%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $35k
- CFCentral Fund of Israelgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +101%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
Religious School
Assistance to establish a community in ramat beit shemesh, israel, founded upon torah principles, prayer, justice, charity and kindness to all peoples. to encourage and promote jewish religious activities.
To foster jewish religious education and disseminate the teachings of rabbi nachman of breslov through publication and distribution of books and cds, as well as seminars, lectures and study groups.
To further jewish education in israel
How this is measured
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Nefesh B'Nefesh Jewish Souls United Inc ↗
- Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
- Who funds DOR YESHURIM INC ↗
- Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
- Who funds KEHILLAH JEWISH EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS CENTER FOR JEWISH STUDIES ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds Richmond Hebrew Day School ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Aj & Sl Stern Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Todd a and Raphaela Stern Family Foundation · Bellows Family Foundation · Bitton Family Foundation Inc · Elliott and Ronni Charitable Fdn · Dennis and Joyce Ruben Foundation · Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago · Sheldon and Freda Robinson Charitable Foundation Inc · Noah Wolff Family Foundation Inc · The Novick Family Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Campbell Foundation For Charitable Giving funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Campbell Foundation For Charitable Giving. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Campbell Foundation For Charitable Giving?
Find your warmest path to Campbell Foundation For Charitable Giving through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Campbell Foundation For Charitable Giving’s filings →