Skip to content

· Private foundation

Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$160kArts & Culture$137kPublic Benefit$69kHealth$41kSocial Science$40kEducation$34kReligion$32kCivil Rights$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k46 grants · $92k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$1,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$594k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
REASON FOUNDATION$10,000
CITIZEN SCIENCE FOUNDATION$7,500
PINE TREE SOCIETY$5,000
LUMIND IDSC FOUNDATION$5,000
NEW YOUR CITY BALLET$5,000
INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION$5,000
METROPOLITIAN OPERA$5,000
LUMIND IDSC FOUNDATION$5,000
DISTINGUSHIED YOUNG WOMEN OF MICHIGAN$5,000
EASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE$2,500
HUDSON INSTITUTE$2,500
COMPASSION AND CHOICES$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LET GROW: $2k → 17%INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%PEACE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $1k → 14%LET GROW: $1k → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $2k → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $1k → 17%NORTH SHORE SENIOR CENTER: $150 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$315k · 54 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
90

Total granted

$315k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+36%

Still filing today

69%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitCivil RightsAnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE REASON FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +80%
  • AI
    ARTSTREAM INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $20k · revenue +68%
  • LI
    LuMind IDSC Foundation
    2× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • MO
    Metropolitan Opera
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AH
    ANCESTRAL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • AS
    ART STREAM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
4
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
5
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
6
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
The Roosevelt Institute

To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.

Education
9
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
10
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
11
Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan "fact tank" that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. Pew Research Center generates a foundation of facts that enriches the public dialogue and…

Social Science
12
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 172 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/88
Grantees still filing
71/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLuMind IDSC Foundation: $15,000 · OtherEASTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $14,000 · OtherLake Shore Unitarian Society (LSUS): $13,000 · OtherNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE: $11,500 · OtherLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $10,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherMetropolitan Opera: $10,000 · Other+102 more: $180,835 · Other+102 moreBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INCDonors Trust Inc: $75,000 · PhilanthropyDonors Trust Inc+3 more: $4,250 · PhilanthropyTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $37,000 · EducationTHE REASON F…HETERODOX ACADEMY: $6,000 · EducationHETERODOX AC…PINE TREE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · EducationPINE TREE SO…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationHILLSDALE CO…STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $3,000 · EducationRANK THE VOTE INC: $2,500 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Education+6 more: $9,700 · Education+6 moreARTSTREAM INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureARTSTREAM I…FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC: $10,500 · Arts & CultureFREE TO CHO…LANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $7,750 · Arts & CultureLANSING SYM…FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $7,500 · Arts & CultureFIELD MUSEU…NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CI…THE JOFFREY BALLET: $2,500 · Arts & CultureKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $2,300 · Arts & Culture+19 more: $9,450 · Arts & Culture+19 moreCATO INSTITUTE: $11,600 · Public BenefitILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $3,500 · Public BenefitBARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $1,000 · Public BenefitTHE HEARTLAND INSTITUTE: $1,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $1,500 · Public BenefitFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $8,500 · Civil RightsFAIRVOTE ILLINOIS: $3,000 · Civil RightsSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $3,000 · Civil RightsCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $2,500 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $2,000 · Civil RightsSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $8,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,500 · AnimalsTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION: $1,200 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGO: $1,000 · AnimalsWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,000 · Animals
Other$294,835Philanthropy$159,250Education$70,700Arts & Culture$65,000Public Benefit$19,600Civil Rights$19,000Animals$12,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDonors Trust Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetARTSTREAM INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLuMind IDSC Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $11,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC: $10,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCitizen Science Foundation: $9,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Institute Inc: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $7,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHETERODOX ACADEMY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPINE TREE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetIndependence Association Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $4,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Nutrition Coalition: $4,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $3,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTATE POLICY NETWORK: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJULIE AND MICHAEL TRACY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLET GROW INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBraver AngelsInc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRANK THE VOTE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF METABOLIC HEALTH PRACTITIONERS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY ROUNDTABLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $2,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetConservative Partnership Institute: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Voices: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK OF ENLIGHTENED WOMEN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCrime Prevention Research Center Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPacific Research Institute For Public Policy: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OREGON ZOO FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTSTREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds LuMind IDSC Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE TO CHOOSE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Citizen Science Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LANSING SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HETERODOX ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PINE TREE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Independence Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Nutrition Coalition ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVOTE ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds STATE POLICY NETWORK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA26× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · The Beach Foundation · The Dunn Foundation · Atlas Economic Research Foundation · Garvey Kansas Foundation · The Randolph Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Bartley J Madden Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Campbell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Campbell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Oregon Historical Society: 10% of income from government
  • Oregon Museum of Science and Industry: 4% of income from government
  • Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Campbell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 172 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Campbell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph