· Public charity
Camp Sertoma Foundation
The organization's primary service project is assisting people with speech, hearing, and language disorders.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $113k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLLIS ADAMS FOUNDATION | $54,640 |
| GREENFIELD SERTOMA CHARITIES | $44,100 |
| SERTOMA INTERNATIONAL SPONSORSHIP FUND (10045 BROAD RIPPLE SERTOMA) | $40,510 |
| CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM | $17,990 |
| NORTH DOWNTOWN SERTOMA CHARITIES | $10,415 |
| WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC | $5,420 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HAHOLLIS ADAMS FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $309k · revenue +7%
- ISINDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $164k · revenue +39%
- SCSERTOMA CLUB OF BROAD RIPPLE2× · 2019–2020 · $39k · revenue +229%
Funded once
- 1F12117 Fishers Sertoma Clubone grant, 2019 · $6k · 64% of their budget
- TCTHE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +52%
James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Associationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our purpose is to serve our Brownsburg community and improve the lives of those who need help. Our mission and our passion is to improve the quality of life for those at risk within the Brownsburg community.
To raise donations for supporting local organizations providing support to handicapped individuals
Assist people and organizations with speech and hearing disabilities through fundraising events.
Civic club that promotes speech & hearing programs, awards scholarships to hearing canidates, high school seniors, and supports various charities
To discover treatments and a cure for als, and to serve, advocate for, and empower people affected by als to live their lives to the fullest.
The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra inspires and unites our community through our music.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
To provide vocational, employment, residential and other support services to individuals with disabilities who are 16 years of age and over. its mission is to provide individuals with disabilities services and opportunities that will…
Sertoma center is dedicated to serving adults with developmental disabilities through providing the highest quality of residential, vocational and community services that empower the persons served to lead richer, fuller lives.
To inspire people with the power of classical music. this is achieved through the creation and syndication of on-air classical music programs to be broadcast by affiliate stations, whereby cmi provides broadcasting and programming. cmi…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Special Olympics Inc and the most unlike its peers is Sertoma Club of Greenfield Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOLLIS ADAMS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SERTOMA CLUB OF GREENFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
- Who funds SERTOMA CLUB OF BROAD RIPPLE ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds 12117 Fishers Sertoma Club ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Camp Sertoma Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.