· Public charity
Camp Nebagamon Scholarship Fund
The CAMP NEBAGAMON SCHOLARSHIP FUND ("cnsf") provides transformative summers for children and teens affected by poverty and disability.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMP COURAGEOUS | $16,500 |
| METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY - THE FOWLER CENTER | $16,500 |
| CAMP SUMMIT | $16,500 |
| CAMP TWIN LAKES | $16,500 |
| CAMP WAWBEEK - EASTER SEALS WISCONSIN | $16,500 |
| CAMP JOY | $15,725 |
| SHERWOOD FOREST | $15,725 |
| WYMAN LEADERS - WYMAN CENTER | $11,850 |
| CAMP PHOENIX - BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS | $11,850 |
| HAPPY HOLLOW CHILDREN'S CAMP | $11,850 |
| CAMP TALL PINES - SUPERIOR YMCA | $7,750 |
| CAMP MILLER - DULUTH YMCA | $7,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $341k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ESEASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC9× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +18%
- SFSHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +11%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI8× · 2017–2024 · $87k · revenue +478%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the YMCA of Greater Cincinnati is to put Christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. Counting members and program participants, the Y reaches more than 114,000 people…
Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…
We build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities with a primary focus on youth activities and programs.
To foster and ensure a vibrant greater Atlanta Jewish community by providing programs and services of distinction that attract, involve, and inspire meaningful connections and promote Jewish values.
Helping youth discover their potential through life-changing experiences and relationships.
Youth and family social services
To enrich the character and leadership development of each person who has a Manito-wish experience, by challenging them to grow in wisdom, in stature, in favor with God, and in favor with one another.
The lakota family ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.
Organization's purpose and nature of activities: young men's christian association of stevens point, wisconsin area, inc. (ymca) strives to be the identified leader in providing programs and services that enrich the quality of life for the…
The winona family ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, strong families and strong…
The mission of the summit area ymca is to strengthen the foundations of community by nurturing and developing the potential of every child, promoting healthy living and fostering a sense of social responsibility in the community.
It is the mission of the boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout law and oath.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Council for Youth Services and the most unlike its peers is The Fowler Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP COURAGEOUS OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds SHERWOOD FOREST CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Methodist Children's Home Society ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER MEMPHIS ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds THE WYMAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUPERIOR - DOUGLAS COUNTY FAMILY YMCA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds THE FOWLER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Joy Outdoor Education Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP OF DREAMS ↗
- Who funds HAPPY HOLLOW CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Camp Nebagamon Scholarship Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.