· Private foundation
Camille Beckman Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $59k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $177k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $220k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLAH WALE TRUST INC | $60,000 |
| YEMEN RELIEF & RECONSTRUCTION FUND | $60,000 |
| IDAHO FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| THE CHILD FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN SURGICAL FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| TERRY REILLY FOUNDATION INC | $30,000 |
| PALESTINIAN CHILDREN RELIEF FUND | $25,000 |
| INTERFAITH SANCTUARY | $15,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $15,000 |
| ORE-IDA COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS | $12,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ADA COUNTY | $10,000 |
| JESSE TREE | $10,000 |
| LINH THUU TU TEMPLE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE6× · 2019–2024 · $281k · revenue +35%
- CFChild Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $200k · revenue +8%
- AWALLAH WALE TRUST INC4× · 2021–2024 · $140k · revenue ×24 · 55% of their budget
Funded once
- ICINTER CHILDREN SURG FOUNDone grant, 2019 · $40k
- TRTERRY REILLY HEALTH CENTERone grant, 2019 · $20k
- BIBONDH-E-SHAMS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +145%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…
Isaad Foundation aspires to preserve human dignity and to help achieve happiness, and to achieve the necessary needs for all individuals.
Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Provide a holistic upbringing to empower underprivileged and vulnerable individuals to become transformative leaders.
Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.
Covenant house is dedicated to serving all of god's children with absolute respect and unconditional love to help youth experiencing homelessness and to protect and safeguard all youth in need.
Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.
Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baitulmaal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allah Wale Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Yemen Relief and Reconstruction Foundation ↗
- Who funds Child Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLAH WALE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds TERRY REILLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BAITULMAAL INC ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA-MOUNTAIN WEST COUNCIL INC 106 ↗
- Who funds GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO ↗
- Who funds BONDH-E-SHAMS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO DIAPER BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CATCH INC COMMUNITY ACTION TOGETHER FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · The Bews Foundation · United Way of Treasure Valley Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Greater Boise Rotary Foundation · James E Hollingsworth Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Camille Beckman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Camille Beckman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Camille Beckman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.