· Private foundation
James E Hollingsworth Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Idaho Foodbank | $7,500 |
| Boise Presbyterian Church | $6,566 |
| Boise Rescue Mission | $5,000 |
| Boise State University Foundation | $4,500 |
| Salvation Army | $2,500 |
| American Red Cross | $2,500 |
| Boise State University | $2,500 |
| Idaho Humane Society | $2,160 |
| Boise Bicycle Project | $2,100 |
| Planned Parenthood | $2,065 |
| Island Union Elementary School | $2,000 |
| Sierra Pacific High School | $2,000 |
| Hanford Youth Soccer League | $1,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,200 |
| Reformed University Fellowship | $1,040 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE5× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +4%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +38%
- IHIdaho Humane Society Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- BPBoise Public Schools Education Founone grant, 2020 · $6k
- HWHarry W Morrison Foundation Incone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -75%
- FUFirst United Methodist Churchone grant, 2021 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education
The Idaho Law Foundation maintains a continuing legal education program and administers grants to 1) educate the public, 2) provide legal services to the state's indigent, 3) develop programs to improve the administration of justice and…
Mission: The Idaho Immunization Coalition is a vital assembly of statewide stakeholders dedicated to promoting health and preventing serious illness through immunization protection of all Idahoans. Vision: Cultivate and mobilize expertise,…
Our mission is to put private and public resources into action statewide to eliminate hunger and provide food security for all idahoans.
Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jannus Inc and the most unlike its peers is Harry W Morrison Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Idaho Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HANFORD YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds BOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Harry W Morrison Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LEE PESKY LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TERRY REILLY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds City of Good Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO DIAPER BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds Bronco Athletic Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Langan Barber Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Bews Foundation · Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · St Luke's Health System Ltd · The Albertsons Companies Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization James E Hollingsworth Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.