Skip to content

· Private foundation

Camden Home for Children & Spcc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$114k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$286kYouth Development$207kHuman Services$175kEducation$110kArts & Culture$104kFood & Nutrition$58kReligion$5k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $72k
$9,440
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RANCH HOPE INC$15,000
THE CHILDRENS HOME$13,702
CROSSROADS$12,000
YOUTH CONSULTATION SVC$11,275
LARC SCHOOL$10,000
CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES$10,000
OAKS INTEGRATED CARE$9,440
ARCHWAY SCHOOL$7,500
LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES$7,490
ACENDA$6,234
GIRL SCOUTS OF CAMDEN CO$5,500
ONE ACCORD$5,154
URBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES$800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%ACENDA: $14k → 8%ACENDA: $12k → 8%ROBINS NEST INC: $9k → 8%ROBINS NEST INC: $7k → 8%ACENDA: $7k → 8%ACENDA: $7k → 8%ACENDA: $6k → 8%ROBINS NEST INC: $6k → 8%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $18k → 7%CROSSROADS: $15k → 7%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $15k → 7%CROSSROADS: $14k → 7%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $15k → 7%CROSSROADS: $14k → 7%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $14k → 7%CROSSROADS: $13k → 7%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $12k → 7%CROSSROADS: $13k → 7%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $10k → 7%CROSSROADS: $12k → 7%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $7k → 7%CROSSROADS: $12k → 7%LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES: $4k → 7%CROSSROADS: $12k → 7%ONE ACCORD: $5k → 12%ONE ACCORD: $5k → 12%ONE ACCORD: $4k → 12%ONE ACCORD: $4k → 12%ONE ACCORD: $4k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICE: $12k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICE: $9k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICE: $8k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICE: $7k → 12%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICE: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$926k · 14 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -100% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$926k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-100%

Still filing today

71%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    Ranch Hope Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $109k · revenue +41%
  • LT
    LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue +51%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • FH
    FELLOWSHIP HOUSE OF SOUTH CAMDEN INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
2
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
3
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
4
Wesley Family Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care.

Human Services
5
The Arc of Essex County Inc

The arc of essex county provides advocacy and services empowering individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to realize a lifetime of personal achievement and full partnership in the community.

Human Services
6
Family Connections Inc

Growth happens here every day. with our counseling, skills-building, training and prevention services, people take control of their own healing and foster connections that make our entire community stronger, safer, and healthier.

Health
7
Concern - Professional Services for Children Youth and Families

Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.

Human Services
8
Childrens Center of Wayne County Inc

The children's center's mission is to help children and families shape their own futures.

Human Services
9
Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc

Hcrs' mission is to provide creative, collaborative, and compassionate health care services that are responsive to the needs of our communities.

Health
10
Cedars Youth Services Inc

To help children and youth achieve safety, stability, and enduring family relationships. cedars founding and enduring priority is safety for children and youth who have experienced, or are vulnerable to, abuse, neglect and/or homelessness.

Arts & Culture
11
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services
12
Cardinal Mccloskey School and Home for Children

The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legacy Treatment Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fellowship House of South Camden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH CONSULTATION SVC: $88,370 · OtherYOUTH CONSULTATION SVCURBANPROMISE MINISTRIES: $66,093 · OtherURBANPROMISE MINISTRIESARCHWAY SCHOOL: $65,880 · OtherARCHWAY SCHOOLCAMDEN CITY CHILDREN'S GARDEN: $57,841 · OtherCAMDEN CITY CHILDREN'S GARDENGIRL SCOUTS OF CAMDEN CO: $52,500 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF CAMDEN COCOMMUNITY TREATMENT SOLUTIONS INC: $29,182 · OtherCOMMUNITY TREATMENT SOLUTIONS INCTHE CHILDRENS HOME: $13,702 · Other+1 more: $4,885 · OtherCROSSROADS INC: $104,450 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS INCLEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INC: $94,022 · Human ServicesLEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INCCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $71,836 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICESACENDA INC DBA ACENDA INTEGRATED HEALTH: $67,427 · Human ServicesACENDA INC DBA ACENDA INTEGRATED HEALTHONE ACCORD T/A KIDS ALLEY: $21,958 · Human ServicesONE ACCORD T/A KIDS ALLEYRanch Hope Inc: $108,718 · HealthRanch Hope IncOAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC: $53,940 · HealthOAKS INTEGRATED CAR…LARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL: $44,140 · Education
Other$378,453Human Services$359,693Health$162,658Education$44,140

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRanch Hope Inc: $108,718 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS INC: $104,450 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetLEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INC: $94,022 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES: $71,836 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetACENDA INC DBA ACENDA INTEGRATED HEALTH: $67,427 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetURBANPROMISE MINISTRIES: $66,093 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetOAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC: $53,940 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL: $44,140 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY TREATMENT SOLUTIONS INC: $29,182 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetONE ACCORD T/A KIDS ALLEY: $21,958 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP HOUSE OF SOUTH CAMDEN INC: $4,885 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ranch Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ACENDA INC DBA ACENDA INTEGRATED HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds URBANPROMISE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds OAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds LARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY TREATMENT SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ACCORD T/A KIDS ALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP HOUSE OF SOUTH CAMDEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New JerseyPA21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Oceanfirst Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · Ravitz Family Foundation · The Wawa Foundation Inc · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Camden Home for Children & Spcc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Camden Home for Children & Spcc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • Center for Family Services: 69% of income from government
  • Oaks Integrated Care Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Community Treatment Solutions Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Legacy Treatment Services Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Camden Home for Children & Spcc?

Find your warmest path to Camden Home for Children & Spcc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Camden Home for Children & Spcc’s filings →

More from the funding graph