· Private foundation
Camden Home for Children & Spcc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $72k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RANCH HOPE INC | $15,000 |
| THE CHILDRENS HOME | $13,702 |
| CROSSROADS | $12,000 |
| YOUTH CONSULTATION SVC | $11,275 |
| LARC SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| OAKS INTEGRATED CARE | $9,440 |
| ARCHWAY SCHOOL | $7,500 |
| LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES | $7,490 |
| ACENDA | $6,234 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF CAMDEN CO | $5,500 |
| ONE ACCORD | $5,154 |
| URBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES | $800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against -100% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RHRanch Hope Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $109k · revenue +41%
- LTLEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $94k · revenue +51%
- CFCENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES8× · 2017–2024 · $72k · revenue +191%
Funded once
- FHFELLOWSHIP HOUSE OF SOUTH CAMDEN INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.
To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.
Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.
To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care.
The arc of essex county provides advocacy and services empowering individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to realize a lifetime of personal achievement and full partnership in the community.
Growth happens here every day. with our counseling, skills-building, training and prevention services, people take control of their own healing and foster connections that make our entire community stronger, safer, and healthier.
Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.
The children's center's mission is to help children and families shape their own futures.
Hcrs' mission is to provide creative, collaborative, and compassionate health care services that are responsive to the needs of our communities.
To help children and youth achieve safety, stability, and enduring family relationships. cedars founding and enduring priority is safety for children and youth who have experienced, or are vulnerable to, abuse, neglect and/or homelessness.
Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.
The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legacy Treatment Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fellowship House of South Camden Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Ranch Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY TREATMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ACENDA INC DBA ACENDA INTEGRATED HEALTH ↗
- Who funds URBANPROMISE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds OAKS INTEGRATED CARE INC ↗
- Who funds LARC SCHOOL INC D/B/A THE LARC NORCROSS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TREATMENT SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ONE ACCORD T/A KIDS ALLEY ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP HOUSE OF SOUTH CAMDEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Oceanfirst Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation · Ravitz Family Foundation · The Wawa Foundation Inc · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Columbia Bank Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Camden Home for Children & Spcc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Center for Family Services — 69% of income from government
- Oaks Integrated Care Inc — 29% of income from government
- Community Treatment Solutions Inc — 27% of income from government
- Legacy Treatment Services Inc — 2% of income from government
- Larc School Inc D/B/a the Larc Norcross School — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Camden Home for Children & Spcc?
Find your warmest path to Camden Home for Children & Spcc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.