Skip to content
Camden E Greene Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Camden E Greene Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$122kHealth$115kRecreation & Sports$65kEnvironment$23kPublic Benefit$11kHuman Services$5kEducation$5kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $700
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND CLINIC$50,000
RAZORBACK FOUNDATION$20,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIER PROJECT: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$348k · 9 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$348k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+31%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsEnvironmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +67%
  • BG
    Botanical Garden Society Of The Ozarks Inc
    4× · 2018–2022 · $19k · revenue +29%
  • VF
    VENTURES FOR CHRIST INC HD MCCARTY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $17k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • AB
    ARKANSAS BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INC D/B/A CAMP SILOAM
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +0%
  • WA
    WALTON ARTS CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • TN
    THE NEW SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arkansas Hospital Education and Research Trust Inc

Education & leadership training to improve patient care.

—
2
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
3
Arkansas Health Group

To be the state's preeminent physician organization - linked to baptist health and dedicated to meeting the needs of patients, employers and physicians through cost effective, high quality care and superior clinical outcomes.

Health
4
Arkansas Medical Society

Collects member dues which are used to advance medical knowledge, elevate the standards of medical education, and secure enactment and enforcement of just laws relating to the field of medicine.

Health
5
National Guard Association of Arkansas

Sponsorship of a group life insurance program for members; there are approximately 1300 members. Support AR National Guard members.

—
6
Arkansas Pharmacists Association

Apa strives to further the professional advancement of pharmacists, advocate the value of pharmacy, and safeguard the health and well-being of every arkansan. its mission is to advance a professional and business environment for arkansas…

—
7
Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families

Advocating for the development and implementation of data-driven public policy that improves child well-being in arkansas, with a focus on economic security, education, health, early childhood, child welfare, juvenile justice, and racial…

Human Services
8
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
9
Foundation of the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame

To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history

Arts & Culture
10
The Arkansas Lighthouse for the Blind Inc

To improve occupational opportunity and public perception of legally blind arkansans through community engagement, work skills enhancement and the production of quality goods and services.

—
11
Arkansas Press Association Inc

Business association of newspapers located in arkansas

—
12
Washington RegIonal Medical System

Washington regional medical system (wrms) provides mgt, strategic planning and financial support to and for wrmc, wr medicorp, wrm services, wrm foundation, and eureka regional health. in addition, various members of management serve in…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washington Regional Medical Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ventures for Christ Inc Hd Mccarty. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLEVELAND CLINIC: $100,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINICCROSS POINTE COMMUNITY CHURCH INCORPORATED: $98,547 · OtherCROSS POINTE COMMUNITY CHURCH INCORPORATEDIndividual grant recipient: $35,885 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVENTURES FOR CHRIST INC HD MCCARTY: $16,700 · OtherVENTURES FOR CHRIST INC HD MCCARTY+8 more: $23,490 · Other+8 moreRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · EducationRAZORBACK FOUNDATI…Botanical Garden Society Of The Ozarks Inc: $19,200 · EnvironmentLeadership Institute: $11,340 · Public BenefitJACKSON L GRAVES FOUNDATION: $6,100 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · HealthARKANSAS BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INC D/B/A CAMP SILOAM: $6,600 · ReligionCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY: $4,400 · Crime & Legal
Other$274,622Education$65,000Environment$19,200Public Benefit$11,340Health$11,100Religion$6,600Crime & Legal$4,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRAZORBACK FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBotanical Garden Society Of The Ozarks Inc: $19,200 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetVENTURES FOR CHRIST INC HD MCCARTY: $16,700 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetLeadership Institute: $11,340 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS BAPTIST ASSEMBLY INC D/B/A CAMP SILOAM: $6,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJACKSON L GRAVES FOUNDATION: $6,100 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTHE NEW SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF BENTON COUNTY: $4,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budget514 Arkansas Chapter of Trout Unlimited: $3,300 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dortha Sue Greene Fou…Arkansas Community Fo…Wal-Mart FoundationNatl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Dortha Sue Greene Foundation IncAR20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dortha Sue Greene Foundation Inc · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Wal-Mart Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Camden E Greene Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Camden E Greene Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Camden E Greene Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Camden E Greene Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Camden E Greene’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home