Skip to content

· Private foundation

Camalotte Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$815k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Environment$1.6MCivil Rights$1.0MHealth$1.0MArts & Culture$726kInternational$318kFood & Nutrition$143kPhilanthropy$128kCrime & Legal$117kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $650k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECOAMERICA$200,000
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL$200,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$200,000
POLARIS PROJECT$50,000
THORN$30,000
SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES$30,000
FOOD ON FOOT$30,000
PARK THEATER TRUST$25,000
THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY ASTOR LENOX AND TILDEN FOUNDATIONS$20,000
VICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM AMERICAS FOUNDATION$15,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $885k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOOD ON FOOT: $30k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $30k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $30k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $20k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $23k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $20k → 14%THORN: $30k → 14%THORN: $30k → 14%THORN: $25k → 14%THORN: $20k → 14%THORN: $12k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $200k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $175k → 14%REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $165k → 14%THORN: $10k → 17%THORN: $10k → 17%THORN: $10k → 17%SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES: $20k → 17%SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
CT
CA
MO
AZ
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.4M · 23 repeat orgs$818k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +53% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
14

Total granted

$5.4M
$568k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+53%

Still filing today

74%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • E
    ECOAMERICA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +68%
  • RF
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION
    5× · 2018–2022 · $673k · revenue +68%
  • RF
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $540k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2024 · $175k
  • AB
    AUSTRALIA BUSHFIRE RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • JM
    JP MORGAN DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
2
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
3
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
4
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
7
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
8
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
9
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
10
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
11
Women First Inc

Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

International
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
19/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF AMER: $837,500 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF AMERREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $672,500 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONThe Frick Collection: $364,500 · OtherThe Frick CollectionPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $175,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD+19 more: $690,750 · Other+19 moreECOAMERICA: $1,655,000 · EnvironmentECOAMERICA+2 more: $60,000 · EnvironmentREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $540,000 · Human ServicesREPRODUCTIVE FREE…FOOD ON FOOT: $153,000 · Human ServicesFOOD ON FOOTTHORN: $146,500 · Human ServicesTHORNSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAM…POLARIS PROJECT: $276,000 · InternationalSAVE VENICE INC: $61,500 · InternationalMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $50,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $41,500 · InternationalVICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM AMERICAS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 · HealthThe Park Theater Trust: $50,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $35,000 · Arts & CulturePortland Museum of Art: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCONVOY OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Religion
Other$2,740,250Environment$1,715,000Human Services$944,500International$449,000Health$200,000Arts & Culture$130,000Religion$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECOAMERICA: $1,655,000 over 8y, 14% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $672,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $540,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $364,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $276,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD ON FOOT: $153,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHORN: $146,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE VENICE INC: $61,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetThe Park Theater Trust: $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $41,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPortland Museum of Art: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRINCE OF WALES FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECOAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ON FOOT ↗
  • Who funds THORN ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE VENICE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Park Theater Trust ↗
  • Who funds MERCADO GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Portland Museum of Art ↗
  • Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE PRINCE OF WALES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIVISIBLE CIVICS ↗
  • Who funds MAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds VICTORIA AND ALBERT MUSEUM AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Lewa Wildlife Conservancy USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Camalotte Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Camalotte Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Camalotte Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Camalotte Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Camalotte’s filings →

    More from the funding graph