Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$40kFood & Nutrition$7kAnimals$7kHuman Services$6kHealth$5kScience & Tech$4kYouth Development$3kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$8,445
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL$8,445
WATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $2k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
VA
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$67k · 15 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$67k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+16%

Still filing today

60%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KO
    KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +32%
  • HO
    HANDS ON HARTFORD INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +105%
  • CH
    CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $4k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • RV
    RIT VETERAN PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • GA
    GRACE ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +154%
  • BF
    BRIGHT FACES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Votes for Animals Inc

CT Votes for Animals (CVA) is a state-wide, grass-roots animal advocacy organization dedicated to improving the lives of CTs animals by championing legislative change. CVA effects policy change by mobilizing animal supporters in…

Animals
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
The Norwich Free Academy

To provide secondary education (grades 9-12) for the city of norwich, the eight surrounding towns, private pay, and international pay students.

Education
7
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
8
Hartford Foundation for Public Giving

The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…

Philanthropy
9
Stamford Charter School for Excellence

The stamford charter school for excellence prepares young people in stamford, connecticut to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social,…

Education
10
The Bridge Academy Inc

The bridge academy, inc. was granted a charter to operate the bridge academy, a public school located in the city of bridgeport, ct. the school was founded in 1997 to provide college preparatory curriculum designed to overcome the…

Education
11
Haverford School

The haverford school, a non-sectarian college preparatory school for junior kindergarten through grade twelve, provides a superior liberal arts education for qualified boys of differing backgrounds. we are committed to developing the full…

Education
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boy Scouts of America Connecticut Rivers Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC — $22,445 · EducationKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INCWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $7,100 · EducationWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INCSUFFIELD ACADEMY — $4,000 · EducationSUFFIELD ACADEMYENTREPRENEURSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $1,850 · Education+2 more — $2,000 · Education+2 moreFOOD 2 KIDS — $7,000 · OtherFOOD 2 KIDSRIT VETERAN PROGRAM — $3,000 · OtherRIT VETERAN PROGRAMNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE AND SAILING — $2,600 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE AND SAILINGWATCH HILL CHAPEL SOCIETY — $2,000 · OtherWATCH HILL CHAPEL SOCIETYUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID — $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - OFFICE OF STU…Individual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOY SCOUT TROOP 163 — $1,000 · OtherGAYLORD SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE — $1,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUND — $950 · Other+7 more — $3,100 · Other+7 moreCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,200 · AnimalsCONNECTIC…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $2,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR W…Bella Vita Rescue Inc — $600 · AnimalsBella Vit…HANDS ON HARTFORD INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesThe Afterglow Foundation Inc — $2,000 · HealthBRIGHT FACES INC — $1,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $500 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $250 · EnvironmentSAVE THE BAY INC — $100 · EnvironmentSCORE Foundation — $250 · Philanthropy
Education$37,395Other$24,650Animals$6,800Human Services$5,500Health$3,500Environment$350Philanthropy$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC — $22,445 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $7,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON HARTFORD INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Afterglow Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENTREPRENEURSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $1,850 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Riseup Group Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHT FACES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CONNECTICUT RIVERS COUNCIL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCORE Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds WATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds HANDS ON HARTFORD INC
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY
  • Who funds The Afterglow Foundation Inc
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
  • Who funds ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GRACE ACADEMY
  • Who funds The Riseup Group Inc
  • Who funds BRIGHT FACES INC
  • Who funds Bella Vita Rescue Inc
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CONNECTICUT RIVERS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds SCORE Foundation
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SAVE THE BAY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne ConnecticutCT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Waterford Country School Inc29% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc20% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Desert Association9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • The Riseup Group Inc1% of income from government
  • Kingswood Oxford School Inc0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found?

Find your warmest path to Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph