Skip to content

· Private foundation

Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$40kFood & Nutrition$7kAnimals$7kHuman Services$6kHealth$5kScience & Tech$4kYouth Development$3kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$8,445
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL$8,445
WATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $2k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%HANDS ON HARTFORD: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$67k · 15 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
17

Total granted

$67k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+16%

Still filing today

60%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KO
    KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +32%
  • HO
    HANDS ON HARTFORD INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $6k · revenue +105%
  • CH
    CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2018–2023 · $4k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • RV
    RIT VETERAN PROGRAM
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUT TROOP 163
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • BF
    BRIGHT FACES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Connecticut Votes for Animals Inc

CT Votes for Animals (CVA) is a state-wide, grass-roots animal advocacy organization dedicated to improving the lives of CTs animals by championing legislative change. CVA effects policy change by mobilizing animal supporters in…

Animals
2
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
The Norwich Free Academy

To provide secondary education (grades 9-12) for the city of norwich, the eight surrounding towns, private pay, and international pay students.

Education
7
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
8
Hartford Foundation for Public Giving

The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…

Philanthropy
9
Stamford Charter School for Excellence

The stamford charter school for excellence prepares young people in stamford, connecticut to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social,…

Education
10
The Bridge Academy Inc

The bridge academy, inc. was granted a charter to operate the bridge academy, a public school located in the city of bridgeport, ct. the school was founded in 1997 to provide college preparatory curriculum designed to overcome the…

Education
11
Haverford School

The haverford school, a non-sectarian college preparatory school for junior kindergarten through grade twelve, provides a superior liberal arts education for qualified boys of differing backgrounds. we are committed to developing the full…

Education
12
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boy Scouts of America Connecticut Rivers Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC: $22,445 · EducationKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INCWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $7,100 · EducationWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INCSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $4,000 · EducationSUFFIELD ACADEMYENTREPRENEURSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $1,850 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · Education+2 moreFOOD 2 KIDS: $7,000 · OtherFOOD 2 KIDSRIT VETERAN PROGRAM: $3,000 · OtherRIT VETERAN PROGRAMNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE AND SAILING: $2,600 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE AND SAILINGWATCH HILL CHAPEL SOCIETY: $2,000 · OtherWATCH HILL CHAPEL SOCIETYUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - OFFICE OF STUDENT FINANCIAL AID: $2,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MAINE - OFFICE OF STU…Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOY SCOUT TROOP 163: $1,000 · OtherGAYLORD SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE: $1,000 · OtherNEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUND: $950 · Other+7 more: $3,100 · Other+7 moreCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,200 · AnimalsCONNECTIC…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR W…Bella Vita Rescue Inc: $600 · AnimalsBella Vit…HANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesThe Afterglow Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthBRIGHT FACES INC: $1,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $250 · EnvironmentSAVE THE BAY INC: $100 · EnvironmentSCORE Foundation: $250 · Philanthropy
Education$37,395Other$24,650Animals$6,800Human Services$5,500Health$3,500Environment$350Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC: $22,445 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $7,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ON HARTFORD INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $4,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Afterglow Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENTREPRENEURSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $1,850 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHT FACES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Riseup Group Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CONNECTICUT RIVERS COUNCIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCORE Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KINGSWOOD OXFORD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERFORD COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ON HARTFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds The Afterglow Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds K9S FOR WARRIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTREPRENEURSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FACES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds The Riseup Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bella Vita Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CONNECTICUT RIVERS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SCORE Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds OREGON NATURAL DESERT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE BAY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne ConnecticutCT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Waterford Country School Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Hands On Hartford Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Desert Association: 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Riseup Group Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Kingswood Oxford School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found?

Find your warmest path to Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Calvin and Sally Hills Family Found’s filings →

More from the funding graph