How much did CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH grant in FY2021?

CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH reported 32 grants totaling $99,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing.

Where is CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH based?

CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH is based in CA.

CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH

To advance and improve soccer through soccer administration in california

$99k

Granted FY2021

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2021.

Recreation & Sports$680kEducation$32kYouth Development$22kArts & Culture$18kOther$303k

02FY2021 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

Under $10k31 grants · $89k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

TOTAL FUTBOL ACADEMY$10,000
SANTA BARBARA SOCCER CLUB$7,000
COACHELLA YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION SOCCER LEAGUE$5,000
LEGENDS FC$5,000
LOS ANGELES FUTBOL FOUNDATION$5,000
BEACH FUTBOL CLUB$5,000
PREMIER SC$5,000
SO CAL BLUES$4,000
RIVERSIDE CITY FC$4,000
TUDELA FUTBOL CLUB LOS ANGELES$4,000
OC SURF NORTH SOCCER CLUB$3,000
DOWNTOWN SOCCER CLUB$2,000
ARSENAL FUTBOL CLUB$2,000
CZ ELITE SOCCER$2,000
CONEJO VALLEY UNITED SOCCER$2,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 74% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$803k · 33 repeat orgs$252k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2021, 15 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$803k

$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%

+32%

Still filing today

85%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CF
CDA FUTBOL CLUB
2× · 2018–2019 · $74k · revenue +80%
RS
REBELS SC
3× · 2018–2021 · $46k · revenue +208%
BF
BEACH FUTBOL CLUB
3× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +93%

Funded once

SF
SLAMMERS FUTBOL CLUBgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue +54%
PS
PENINSULA SLALBION
one grant, 2019 · $16k · revenue +24%
6F
66ERS FOUNDATION DBA SUNSTYLE FC
one grant, 2018 · $16k · revenue +67% · 58% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Simi Valley Youth Soccer League

Simi youth soccer league provides extra-curricular recreation and sports activities for youth in the community.

Recreation & Sports

Antelope Valley Futbol Club

To promote youth development in socer skills

Recreation & Sports

Chula Vista Futbol Club

Our mission is to be the leader in the south bay by offering boys and girls ages 8 to 18 the opportunity to develop both socially and physically through the sport of soccer. to achieve this our coaches are licensed through us youth…

—

International Soccer Club

Recreation & Sports

Inland Valley Soccer League

To promote amateur soccer

Recreation & Sports

So Cal Rush Soccer Club

Teams-the club hosted 10 teams with boys and girls ages 4 to 18. the children on each of the teams were able to participate in several various tournaments in california. the club also hosts several events such as a 3v3 tournament, a skills…

Recreation & Sports

Cold Spring Area Soccer Club

—

Monterey County Soccer League

MCSC core objective is to teach and train our youth soccer players develop leadership qualities and promote good sportsmanship among players

Recreation & Sports

Kickers Fc Inc

We created the soccer club to help boys and girls reach a competitive level of soccer so tat when they get older, they will have the possibilities to earn a college shcolarship and to have a great up bringing and wonderful experience.

Recreation & Sports

Las Vegas Soccer Association

The mission of Las Vegas Soccer Association is to develop well-balanced, successful student athletes in a healthy, positive soccer environment. We will promote and develop excellence in club soccer based on the values of skill,…

Recreation & Sports

Sugar City Soccer League

Recreation & Sports

Tag Fc Inc

Promote the sport of soccer while also providing instruiction in competion to the youth

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern California Soccer Academy and the most unlike its peers is Fellowship of Christian Athletes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

7/77

the rest of the field

13%

12,660/95,148

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

51/60

Grantees still filing

37/60

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Recreation & Sports$680,000Other$303,000Education$32,000Youth Development$22,000Arts & Culture$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA17.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: 66ERS FOUNDATION DBA SUNSTYLE FC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing; revenue up +67% since.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 461427401 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on 66ERS FOUNDATION DBA SUNSTYLE FC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to California State Soccer Assoc South?

Find your warmest path to California State Soccer Assoc South through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to California State Soccer Assoc South?

More from the funding graph

CALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to California State Soccer Assoc South?

More from the funding graph