Skip to content

· Private foundation

Caddock Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$555k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$256k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$6.5MHousing & Shelter$122kCivil Rights$85kHuman Services$73kHealth$61kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $256k
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABSOLUTELY FREE$256,000
GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY$80,000
GRACE LIFE MINISTRIES$70,000
BETTER LIFE MINISTRIES$36,370
ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
SAFE HAVEN$16,000
MESSAGE OF LIFE MINISTRIES$15,000
HOPE CLINIC FOR WOMEN$12,000
MISSION EURASIA$8,000
CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH$8,000
EMMAUS WORLDWIDE$7,000
THRU THE BIBLE RADIO$4,000
HEBREW CHRISTIAN WITNESS$2,800
PILGRIM TRACT SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%KVIP RADIO: $21k → 14%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $84k → 8%HOPE CLINIC FOR WOMEN: $12k → 17%PILGRIM TRACT SOCIETY: $18k → 14%OPERATION MOBILIZATION: $23k → 6%BETTER LIFE MINISTRIES: $69k → 9%MESSAGE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $19k → 10%MISSION EURASIA: $44k → 7%CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $16k → 7%KVIP RADIO: $18k → 14%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $82k → 8%HOPE CLINIC FOR WOMEN: $12k → 17%OPERATION MOBILIZATION: $20k → 6%BETTER LIFE MINISTRIES: $53k → 9%MESSAGE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $18k → 10%MISSION EURASIA: $16k → 7%CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $16k → 7%KVIP RADIO: $18k → 14%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $80k → 8%OPERATION MOBILIZATION: $15k → 6%BETTER LIFE MINISTRIES: $36k → 9%MESSAGE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $17k → 10%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $80k → 8%OPERATION MOBILIZATION: $12k → 6%BETTER LIFE MINISTRIES: $18k → 9%MESSAGE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $15k → 10%KVIP RADIO: $18k → 14%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $64k → 8%ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION: $23k → 17%KVIP RADIO: $18k → 14%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $60k → 8%ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 17%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $60k → 8%ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION: $19k → 17%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $60k → 8%ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION: $17k → 17%GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $60k → 8%SAFE HAVEN: $16k → 17%SAFE HAVEN: $15k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $677k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $645k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $623k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $613k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $568k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $478k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $452k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $375k → 17%ABSOLUTELY FREE: $256k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
IA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
KS
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 21 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$6.9M
$51k

Still filing today

52%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ABSOLUTELY FREE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.7M · revenue +47% · 79% of their budget
  • GE
    GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $630k · revenue +164%
  • BL
    BETTER LIFE MINISTRIES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $175k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • G
    GRACELIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $45k
  • HP
    HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER (FORMERLY N'LITE WOMEN'S CLINIC)
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • SO
    SOURCE OF LIGHT MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gospel Crusade Ministries Inc
—
2
Signs & Wonders Ministries
—
3
Puzzle Piece Ministries

To deliver the message of Jesus

Religion
4
The Rock Ministries

To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations

Human Services
5
Rhema Ministry

Free distribution of Christian publications.

Religion
6
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
7
Christian Literature for Africa

Literature for africa

Religion
8
Walking On Water Ministries Inc

Teach the word of god

Religion
9
Worldcast Ministries

Publishing, writing, sales & distribution of Christian Books; speaking throughout the US and foreign countries on Christian subjects. Attending orphanages, Christian schools and Bible colleges in the US and foreign countries assisting in…

Religion
10
Christlife Inc

Distribute gospel messages in book form

Human Services
11
Frontier Evangelism Inc

Preaching the Gospel in Crusades

—
12
Mohammed Mussa Ministries

Evangelism

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Eurasia; the most unlike its peers is Roseburg Rescue Mission Lighthouse of God Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABSOLUTELY FREE INC: $4,685,800 · ReligionABSOLUTELY FREE INCGRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $630,000 · ReligionGRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY+6 more: $472,588 · Religion+6 moreGRACE LIFE MINISTRIES: $485,500 · OtherGRACE LIFE MINIS…Individual grant recipient: $97,500 · OtherIndividual grant…SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME: $72,500 · OtherSAFE HAVEN MATER…OPERATION MOBILIZATION: $56,100 · OtherOPERATION MOBILI…HOPE CLINIC FOR WOMEN: $49,000 · OtherGRACELIFE: $45,000 · OtherCENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: $44,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP FUND INC: $43,100 · Other+8 more: $101,350 · Other+8 moreROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC: $121,750 · Housing & Shelter
Religion$5,788,388Other$994,050Housing & Shelter$121,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABSOLUTELY FREE INC: $4,685,800 over 9y, 79% of budgetGRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY: $630,000 over 9y, 16% of budgetBETTER LIFE MINISTRIES: $175,370 over 4y, 24% of budgetROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC: $121,750 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $91,626 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMESSAGE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $79,700 over 7y, 13% of budgetSAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME: $72,500 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetIRELAND OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $58,500 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetECS Ministries: $46,202 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP FUND INC: $43,100 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPILGRIM TRACT SOCIETY INC: $21,190 over 3y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABSOLUTELY FREE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE EVANGELICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BETTER LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ROSEBURG RESCUE MISSION LIGHTHOUSE OF GOD MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION EURASIA ↗
  • Who funds MESSAGE OF LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN MATERNITY HOME ↗
  • Who funds IRELAND OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ECS Ministries ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WORKERS FELLOWSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PILGRIM TRACT SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Caddock Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Caddock Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Caddock Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Caddock Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Caddock’s filings →

    More from the funding graph