Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cabela Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$1.1MAnimals$1.0MRecreation & Sports$401kEducation$380kHealth$300kCivil Rights$215kYouth Development$69kPublic Benefit$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $610
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION$100,000
KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE$25,000
BLAINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$610
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $25k → 10%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $10k → 10%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $10k → 10%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $10k → 10%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $8k → 10%KIDS OUTDOOR ZONE: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
NV
OH
CO
NE
VA
AZ
AR
TN
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.4M · 11 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$3.4M
$152k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+180%

Still filing today

55%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $610 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WS
    WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +83%
  • TU
    THE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $400k · revenue +88%
  • RU
    REGIS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $380k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • SO
    State of Nevada Department of Wildlife
    one grant, 2022 · $64k
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +190%
  • MH
    MODERN HUNTSMAN MEDIA LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilderness Conservation Foundation
Environment
2
Safari Club International

To protect the freedom to hunt and to promote wildlife conservation worldwide.

Animals
3
Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership Inc

To guarantee all americans quality places to hunt and fish.

Animals
4
Ruffed Grouse Society Group Return

Established in 1961, the ruffed grouse society unites conservationists to improve wildlife habitat and forest health and promote a conservation ethic, all grounded in the tenets of science-based management practices.

Environment
5
Safari Club International West Texas Chapter Inc

Education and Wildlife Conservation

Animals
6
Dallas Safari Club

The organization's mission is to conserve wildlife and wilderness lands; to educate the youth and the general public and to promote and protect the rights and interests of hunters worldwide.

7
Ruffed Grouse Society

1. established in 1961, the ruffed grouse society unites conservationists to improve wildlife habitat and forest health and promote a conservation ethic, all grounded in the tenets of science-based management practices.

Environment
8
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
9
The Huntsman Foundation
10
Tanzania Wildlife & Conservation Fund Inc

See schedule oto encourage and promote the development, preservation, propagation,conservation and well-being of endangered species of wildlife in the united republic of tanzania, through such means as selective trophy hunting and the…

Animals
11
The United States Sportsmen's Alliance Inc

To protect and advance america's heritage of hunting, fishing and trapping by uniting sportsmen to protect against legislative attacks from the animal rights movement in congress, all 50 state legislatures and at the ballot box. to gain…

12
Safari Club International Minnesota

Promote wildlife and nature studies

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United States Sportsmen's Alliance Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Kids Outdoors Zone Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PATRICKS CHURCH — $333,000 · OtherST PATRICKS CHURCHST ANTHONY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $300,000 · OtherST ANTHONY HEALTH FOUNDATIONST LUKE'S CATHOLIC CHURCH — $286,000 · OtherST LUKE'S CATHOLIC CHURCHCHURCH OF THE HOLY GHOST — $242,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE HOLY GHOSTHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCH — $242,000 · OtherHOLY SPIRIT CATHOLIC CHURCHState of Nevada Department of Wildlife — $64,000 · Other+5 more — $65,910 · OtherWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION — $500,000 · AnimalsWILD SHEEP FOUNDATIONTHE IVAN CARTER WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE INC — $447,937 · AnimalsTHE IVAN CARTER WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ALLIA…THE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 · AnimalsTHE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUN…+2 more — $22,500 · AnimalsREGIS UNIVERSITY — $380,000 · EducationREGIS UNIVER…NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $215,000 · Civil RightsTHE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC — $69,000 · Human Services
Other$1,532,910Animals$1,370,437Education$380,000Civil Rights$215,000Human Services$69,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWILD SHEEP FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE IVAN CARTER WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE INC — $447,937 over 3y, 32% of budgetTHE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC — $400,000 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetREGIS UNIVERSITY — $380,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA — $215,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC — $69,000 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ORIGINS FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILD SHEEP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE IVAN CARTER WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds THE UNITED STATES SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds REGIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE KIDS OUTDOORS ZONE INC
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC
  • Who funds THE ORIGINS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dsc Foundation IncTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dsc Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cabela Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cabela Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cabela Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph