· Private foundation
Byron & Alice Lockwood Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $712k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $310k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION | $100,000 |
| JUBILEE REACH | $90,000 |
| EASTSIDE ACADEMY | $70,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ENVIRONMEN | $50,000 |
| BRIDGE DISABILITY MINISTRIES | $45,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $40,000 |
| RAINIER ATHLETES | $30,000 |
| FARE START | $30,000 |
| CRISIS CONNECTION | $30,000 |
| ACRES OF DIAMONDS | $30,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY EASTSIDE | $30,000 |
| SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAT | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF YOUTH | $25,000 |
| AGC EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| THE MUSEUM OF FLIGHT | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $492k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
49 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JRJubilee REACH6× · 2019–2024 · $420k · revenue +14%
- EAEASTSIDE ACADEMY6× · 2019–2024 · $405k · revenue +8%
- AOAcres of Diamonds6× · 2019–2024 · $225k · revenue +92%
Funded once
- CFCENTER FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESEAone grant, 2019 · $30k
- CMCRISTA Ministriesone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -38%
- SMSOUND MENTAL HEALTHone grant, 2019 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
Building changes advances equitable responses to homelessness in washington state, with a focus on children, youth, and families. we work at the intersection of housing, education, and health systems, partnering with communities and public…
To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.
Transitions works to end poverty and homelessness for women and children in Spokane, Washington.
Washington Bikes works to ensure that all who ride a bicycle in Washington have safe comfortable and convenient places to ride. Organization advocates for bicyclists rights and shapes policies.
Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.
Family law casa is committed to positive long-term outcomes for children, families, and communities navigating economic injustice across king county. we advance intersectional equity by providing free advocacy services for children…
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Center and the most unlike its peers is Maris Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jubilee REACH ↗
- Who funds EASTSIDE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Bridge Ministries Bridge Disability Ministries ↗
- Who funds Acres of Diamonds ↗
- Who funds Maris Place ↗
- Who funds FARESTART ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AGC OF WASHINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SOPHIA WAY ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF YOUTH ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SEATTLE ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE EASTSIDE ↗
- Who funds THE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Outdoors for all Foundation ↗
- Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE BABY ↗
- Who funds Bike Works Seattle ↗
- Who funds GEEKING OUT KIDS OF COLOR ↗
- Who funds REAL ESCAPE FROM THE SEX TRADE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST CENTER ↗
- Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VENTURES ↗
- Who funds Washington Women in Need ↗
- Who funds NW Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds EASTSIDE LEGAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Moccasin Lake Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Medina Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Aven Foundation · Ellison Foundation · Elizabeth a Lynn Foundation · Dv & Ida McEachern Charitable Tr
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Byron & Alice Lockwood Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Byron & Alice Lockwood Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Byron & Alice Lockwood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.