Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Burton and Barbara Langley Family

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$219kReligion$158kHuman Services$83kHealth$51kHousing & Shelter$30kEnvironment$30kArts & Culture$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $85k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARDIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 2$30,000
APPALACHIAN BANNER ACADEMY$15,000
WE WILL GO$10,000
MY VERETAN PASSION$10,000
GALILEAN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$10,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY$10,000
ST CLOUD COMMUNITY CHURCH$8,750
HARDIN CITY 4H$6,250
YOUNGER CREEK BAPTIST CHURCH$2,500
CCMRF$2,000
CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY$1,500
ANCIENT CITY BAPTIST CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MY VERETAN PASSION: $10k → 15%HANEY TECHNICAL CENTER: $10k → 12%MASTERS & WARDENS MASONIC 17TH: $6k → 13%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY: $10k → 20%APPALACHIAN BANNER ACADEMY: $15k → 14%WE WILL GO: $10k → 23%EDEN RURITAN NATIONAL: $5k → 14%CHRISTIAN ACADEMY OF LOUSIANA: $8k → 12%PROVISIONS PROJECT INC: $5k → 19%CLARITY SOLUTIONS: $13k → 13%GALILEAN CHRISTIAN ACADCMY: $13k → 26%ONEIDA BAPTIST INSTITUTE: $10k → 35%MY VERETAN PASSION: $8k → 15%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY: $10k → 20%APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT: $10k → 14%EDEN RURITAN NATIONAL: $5k → 14%CLARITY SOLUTIONS: $10k → 13%GALILEAN HOME MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 26%ONEIDA BAPTIST INSTITUTE: $10k → 35%ST CLOUD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 13%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY: $10k → 20%APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT: $10k → 14%CLARITY SOLUTIONS: $10k → 13%GALILEAN HOME MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 26%ONEIDA: $10k → 35%ST CLOUD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $9k → 13%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY: $10k → 20%GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $5k → 14%CLARITY SOLUTIONS: $10k → 13%GALILEAN HOME MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 26%ONEIDA BAPTIST INSTITUTE: $10k → 35%ST CLOUD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $6k → 13%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY: $9k → 20%APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT: $10k → 14%HARDIN CITY 4H: $6k → 13%GALILEAN HOME MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 26%ONEIDA BAPTIST INSTITUTE: $10k → 35%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY: $8k → 20%GRACE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $5k → 14%HARDIN CITY 4H: $6k → 13%GALILEAN HOME MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 26%HOLMES COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL FFA: $5k → 20%APPALACHIAN BANNER ACADEMY: $5k → 14%HARDIN COUNTY FARMERS MARKET: $5k → 13%GALILEAN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $10k → 26%KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $6k → 13%WASHINGTON COLLEGE ACADEMY: $5k → 14%MISSION HOPE FOR KIDS: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IN
OH
KY
VA
AZ
AR
TN
LA
MS
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$535k · 21 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
14

Total granted

$535k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+89%

Still filing today

33%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GALILEAN HOMES MINISTRIES
    5× · 2018–2022 · $50k · revenue +16%
  • HC
    HEARTLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER
    4× · 2019–2022 · $43k · revenue +257%
  • AS
    APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $30k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • HT
    HANEY TECHNICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • O
    ONEIDA
    one grant, 2023 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
2
Providence Christian Academy

In dependence upon Almighty God, for His glory alone, and together with family and church, the mission of Providence Christian Academy is to provide exemplary education for the vulnerable in the light of God's Word for time and eternity.

Education
3
Ambassador Baptist College

Degreed courses offered to men and women in training and preparation to enter the ministry of preaching and teaching the Gospel.

Education
4
Wellington Christian Academy Inc

Operate a private school.

Education
5
God's Bible School College & Missionary Training Home

God's bible school and college seeks to glorify god and to serve his church by providing higher education centered in holy scripture and shaped by wesleyan conviction, thus preparing faithful servants to proclaim jesus christ and spread…

Education
6
Covenant Academy of Mobile

Operation of a public charter school in Mobile Alabama.

Human Services
7
Annapolis Christian Academy

Private school for grades k-12

Education
8
New Hope Education Inc

New hope christian academy is a school of academic excellence; committed to developing christian leadership,compassion for others, and cultivating god's purpose academically and spiritually in the lives of the individual student served.…

9
Abilene Christian School Inc

The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.

Education
10
Arlington Christian School Inc

The school's mission is to train each student in a Godly manner in the areas of social, spiritual, and academic development.

11
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
12
Washington Prayer Coalition

to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is We Will Go and the most unlike its peers is My Veteran Passion. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARDIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 2 — $150,000 · OtherHARDIN COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 2FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAY — $61,000 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BONIFAYONEIDA BAPTIST INSTITUTE — $40,000 · OtherONEIDA BAPTIST INSTITUTEST CLOUD COMMUNITY CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherST CLOUD COMMUNITY CHURCH+25 more — $172,500 · Other+25 moreGALILEAN HOMES MINISTRIES — $50,000 · EducationGALILEAN HOME…APPALACHIAN BANNER ACADEMY — $20,000 · EducationAPPALACHIAN B…Cedarville University — $5,500 · EducationCedarville Un…HEARTLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $42,500 · HealthAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterMy Veteran Passion — $20,000 · Public BenefitWE WILL GO — $10,000 · ReligionMISSION HOPE FOR KIDS INC — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$448,500Education$75,500Health$42,500Housing & Shelter$30,000Public Benefit$20,000Religion$10,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGALILEAN HOMES MINISTRIES — $50,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER — $42,500 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN BANNER ACADEMY — $20,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetMy Veteran Passion — $20,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetWashington College Academy — $12,500 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetWE WILL GO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCedarville University — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION HOPE FOR KIDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GALILEAN HOMES MINISTRIES
  • Who funds HEARTLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER
  • Who funds APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN BANNER ACADEMY
  • Who funds My Veteran Passion
  • Who funds Washington College Academy
  • Who funds WE WILL GO
  • Who funds Cedarville University
  • Who funds The Provisions Project Inc
  • Who funds MISSION HOPE FOR KIDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Burton and Barbara Langley Family funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Burton and Barbara Langley Family?

    Find your warmest path to Burton and Barbara Langley Family through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph