Skip to content

· Public charity

Burning Man Project

BURNING MAN PROJECT facilitates and extends burning man culture into the larger world.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$3.5MEnvironment$153kCommunity Improvement$59kPublic Safety & Disaster$57kPhilanthropy$55kHousing & Shelter$16kReligion$15kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $316,967, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,576,720 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,259,753 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $288k
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONECOPHONY COLLECTIVE LLC$40,000
ROCKET CAR COLLECTIVE LLC$30,000
O CHELSY PRODUCTIONS LLC$24,000
TYLER FUQUA CREATIONS INC$22,000
PRODUCT OF MARS INC$20,000
BARNACLE BROS SCULPTURE & CUSTOM FABRICATION INC$20,000
POETIC KINETICS INC$20,000
GOODLY HOUSE PRODUCTIONS LLC$19,000
THE NEXT EARTH PROJECT$15,223
CIRCAFORM$15,000
BRS STUDIOS CORP$14,760
THE HONORS ACADEMY OF LITERATURE$13,984
CARBON PICTURES$12,000
ARTBUILDS COLLECTIVE LTD$12,000
LOOKING UP ARTS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RPGA STUDIO INC: $6k → 13%HOH-SHARE INC: $6k → 15%THE GENERATOR INC: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
NJ
CA
UT
CO
WV
VA
MD
NM
NC
OK
LA
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $325k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, $124k to organizations and $201k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$192k · 59% · 5 grants · 5 people

Stated purpose: HONORARIA ART GRANT · INTERNATIONAL ART GRANT

North America (Canada and Mexico)$66k · 20% · 3 people

Stated purpose: DESIGN GRANT · HONORARIA ART GRANT

East Asia and the Pacific$47k · 14% · 3 people

Stated purpose: COMMUNITY BASED PROJECT GRANT · DESIGN GRANT · HONORARIA ART GRANT

South America$19k · 6% · 1 person

Stated purpose: HONORARIA ART GRANT

Russia and Neighboring States$2k · 0% · 1 person

Stated purpose: DESIGN GRANT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Burning Man Project’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 54% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 40%.

Burning Man Projectlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 28 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
94

Total granted

$1.4M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

11%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    REARED IN STEEL LLC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $110k
  • XP
    XIAN PRODUCTIONS
    3× · 2018–2021 · $102k
  • JL
    JEN LEWIN STUDIOS LLC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $99k

Funded once

  • PP
    PLAYA PROJECTS LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $161k
  • TO
    TEMPLE OF DIRECTION LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $115k
  • BP
    Big Picture Builders LLC
    one grant, 2019 · $65k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pro Arts Inc

Pro Arts supports art that pushes boundaries, generates critical discourse, and challenges the status quo. Annually Pro Arts presents over 200 artists, working in diverse artistic fields

—
2
Art Explorium
—
3
Artyard (Formerly Sprocket Arts)
Philanthropy
4
The Art Complex Inc
—
5
Art in Uncommon Places

Develop commuities with art

Arts & Culture
6
Art in the Pearl Inc

Art education and awareness.

Arts & Culture
7
Chinatown Mural Project Inc

ChinatownMuralProject brings vibrant, large-scale murals to Chinatown and beyond. These culturally resonant artworks celebrate the communitys heritage, history, and daily life in a whimsical, accessible style. The project aims to brighten…

Arts & Culture
8
Launch Productions

We produce, manage and direct events, programs and exhibitions for the purpose of developing artist - audience relationships throughout important Los Angeles communities. Passionate about promoting all contemporary art-forms and their…

Arts & Culture
9
Curatus

The furthering and advancement of the arts.

—
10
SoLA Contemporary

We provide artwork to the community

Arts & Culture
11
Global Arts Project Inc
Arts & Culture
12
Buckhorn Public Arts Inc

art education

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Burner Project Co; the most unlike its peers is Mayhem Snail Art Collective Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/21
Grantees still filing
9/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLAYA PROJECTS LLC: $160,965 · OtherTEMPLE OF DIRECTION LLC: $115,000 · Other+112 more: $3,026,163 · Other+112 moreLOOKING UP ARTS FOUNDATION: $43,100 · Arts & CulturePINTO ART INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK BURNER PROJECT CO: $35,000 · Arts & CultureParticipatory Safety Inc: $33,000 · Arts & CultureElement 11: $27,739 · Arts & CultureKINDRED ARTS INC: $27,000 · Arts & CultureArtBuilds Collective Ltd: $21,800 · Arts & CultureMAYHEM SNAIL ART COLLECTIVE LTD: $10,430 · Arts & CultureArts Council of New Orleans: $9,250 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $12,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF BLACK ROCK HIGH ROCK INC: $72,300 · EnvironmentPROTECTORS OF TULE SPRINGS: $35,000 · EnvironmentBlack Rock Labs: $72,800 · Public BenefitBlack Joy Parade: $35,000 · PhilanthropyCOALA FOUNDATION: $25,718 · PhilanthropyCommunity Through Colors: $37,172 · Public Safety & DisasterThe Generator Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesHOH SHARE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesRPGA STUDIO INC: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$3,302,128Arts & Culture$259,319Environment$107,300Public Benefit$72,800Philanthropy$60,718Public Safety & Disaster$37,172Human Services$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBlack Rock Labs: $72,800 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF BLACK ROCK HIGH ROCK INC: $72,300 over 3y, 33% of budgetLOOKING UP ARTS FOUNDATION: $43,100 over 3y, 25% of budgetPINTO ART INC: $40,000 over 1y, 62% of budgetBLACK BURNER PROJECT CO: $35,000 over 1y, 96% of budgetBlack Joy Parade: $35,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetParticipatory Safety Inc: $33,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetElement 11: $27,739 over 1y, 13% of budgetCOALA FOUNDATION: $25,718 over 1y, 46% of budgetArtBuilds Collective Ltd: $21,800 over 2y, 12% of budgetMAYHEM SNAIL ART COLLECTIVE LTD: $10,430 over 1y, 96% of budgetArts Council of New Orleans: $9,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Generator Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRPGA STUDIO INC: $6,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTHE HERMITAGE MUSEUM AND GARDENS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Black Rock Labs ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BLACK ROCK HIGH ROCK INC ↗
  • Who funds LOOKING UP ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PINTO ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Through Colors ↗
  • Who funds PROTECTORS OF TULE SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds BLACK BURNER PROJECT CO ↗
  • Who funds Black Joy Parade ↗
  • Who funds Participatory Safety Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC1.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Burning Man Project funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Burning Man Project. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 134 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Burning Man Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph